Selected Posts on Anti-Relativity - 物理の勉強掲示板
Selected Posts on Anti-Relativity
0nakayama
2023/02/18 09:14 3968view
Michelson-Morley Experiment
It (done in air) is nonsense. In air, light is propagated at c/n. So, the result of M-M experiment (done in air) is only natural.
In a book "Theory of Relativity" by Pauli, W 1958, it's written as follows (quoted from English version ; in 1-6). "Rather should one say that for an observer moving with medium, light is propagated as usual with velocity c/n in all directions".
7pt
9pt
コメントする
検索
画像一覧
1nakayama 2023/02/18 09:20
Speed of Light
The defined value of speed of light is based on measurements (with wavelength and frequency) done by Evenson et al. in 1973. Error is 1.1 m / s in pramai. Now measuring instrument is separated into a measuring part and a light source part. When one of them is moved at a constant speed higher than above error (in the direction of light path), different value will be obtained.
1pt
1pt
2023/02/18 09:20
Speed of Light
The defined value of speed of light is based on measurements (with wavelength and frequency) done by Evenson et al. in 1973. Error is 1.1 m / s in pramai. Now measuring instrument is separated into a measuring part and a light source part. When one of them is moved at a constant speed higher than above error (in the direction of light path), different value will be obtained.
1pt1pt
2nakayama 2023/02/18 09:22
Propagation of Light
Light is propagated in two ways (as follows).
1. In outer space, a star light is reflected by a mirror. Speed of incident light is constant relative to aether.
2. In outer space, a star light is reflected by a mirror. Speed of reflected light is constant relative to the mirror (the emission theory).
In two pictures sbove each, speed of light to a moving observer follows Galilean transformation.
0pt
0pt
2023/02/18 09:22
Propagation of Light
Light is propagated in two ways (as follows).
1. In outer space, a star light is reflected by a mirror. Speed of incident light is constant relative to aether.
2. In outer space, a star light is reflected by a mirror. Speed of reflected light is constant relative to the mirror (the emission theory).
In two pictures sbove each, speed of light to a moving observer follows Galilean transformation.
0pt0pt
3nakayama 2023/02/18 09:29
Equivalence principle
For gravity and inertial force in free-falling elevator, acceptable explanation will be Newton’s law of action and reaction. Equivalence principle should be forgotten.
0pt
0pt
2023/02/18 09:29
Equivalence principle
For gravity and inertial force in free-falling elevator, acceptable explanation will be Newton’s law of action and reaction. Equivalence principle should be forgotten.
0pt0pt
4nakayama 2023/02/18 09:33
Inertial Force is not Fictitious
The same five bodies (mass m) are lined up sideways on a horizontal plane. Five bodies are tied with four strings. Assume that horizontal plane is zero friction, and mass of strings is zero. On right most body, force of 5ma is acting to the right and five bodies start a uniform linear accelerating motion toward the right. Tension acting on four strings are, from right to left, 4ma, 3ma, 2ma, and 1ma.
Tension in the string above will be the same to an observer of any frame of motion. Inertial force (accelerated motion) is not fictitious.
0pt
0pt
2023/02/18 09:33
Inertial Force is not Fictitious
The same five bodies (mass m) are lined up sideways on a horizontal plane. Five bodies are tied with four strings. Assume that horizontal plane is zero friction, and mass of strings is zero. On right most body, force of 5ma is acting to the right and five bodies start a uniform linear accelerating motion toward the right. Tension acting on four strings are, from right to left, 4ma, 3ma, 2ma, and 1ma.
Tension in the string above will be the same to an observer of any frame of motion. Inertial force (accelerated motion) is not fictitious.
0pt0pt
5nakayama 2023/02/18 09:36
Aberration
Aberration is caused by various motions of Earth relative to stationary aether (uniform isotropic). Light that enters upper air of Earth (from aether) is bent in the direction of motion of Earth. As a phenomenon, aberration is completed in the upper air. The same as refraction.
Therefore, illustration of raindrops and an umbrella is NG. Result of Airy’s experiment with a water-filled telescope is only natural. It is said that apparent displacement of stars is displaced in the direction of Earth’s motion, but in fact, it will be the opposite. You can check this by drawing light bending (in upper air) on a paper.
0pt
0pt
2023/02/18 09:36
Aberration
Aberration is caused by various motions of Earth relative to stationary aether (uniform isotropic). Light that enters upper air of Earth (from aether) is bent in the direction of motion of Earth. As a phenomenon, aberration is completed in the upper air. The same as refraction.
Therefore, illustration of raindrops and an umbrella is NG. Result of Airy’s experiment with a water-filled telescope is only natural. It is said that apparent displacement of stars is displaced in the direction of Earth’s motion, but in fact, it will be the opposite. You can check this by drawing light bending (in upper air) on a paper.
0pt0pt
6nakayama 2023/02/18 09:40
Lorentz Contraction
Plane waves of starlight (wavelength is constant) is arriving from upper left 45 degrees. Two spacecrafts are sailing in the right and left directions. Number of waves hitting the front and rear ends (A and B) of each spacecraft is the same. Therefore, number of waves existing between A and B is invariant (for both spacecrafts, regardless of lateral motion). Lorentz contractions will be impossible.
Relativity of simultaneity will be impossible also.
0pt
0pt
2023/02/18 09:40
Lorentz Contraction
Plane waves of starlight (wavelength is constant) is arriving from upper left 45 degrees. Two spacecrafts are sailing in the right and left directions. Number of waves hitting the front and rear ends (A and B) of each spacecraft is the same. Therefore, number of waves existing between A and B is invariant (for both spacecrafts, regardless of lateral motion). Lorentz contractions will be impossible.
Relativity of simultaneity will be impossible also.
0pt0pt
7nakayama 2023/02/18 09:51
Aether
All kinds of aberration are caused by motion of Earth. Qualitatively, quantitatively. For example, cycle of annual aberration is 365 days. It is reflection of motion of Earth. On the other hand, any motion of star’s side has no influence. Only position on the celestial sphere is valid. These facts will be explainable only by aether.
For an observer stationary with respect to the aether frame, there will be no aberration.
0pt
0pt
2023/02/18 09:51
Aether
All kinds of aberration are caused by motion of Earth. Qualitatively, quantitatively. For example, cycle of annual aberration is 365 days. It is reflection of motion of Earth. On the other hand, any motion of star’s side has no influence. Only position on the celestial sphere is valid. These facts will be explainable only by aether.
For an observer stationary with respect to the aether frame, there will be no aberration.
0pt0pt
8nakayama 2023/02/18 19:24
Propagated of light (2)
In outer space, a starlight is reflected by a mirror. There is a formula c = f λ. Now, the mirror is stationary. In comparing of incident light and reflected light, f is the same. And usually, c & λ are different.
Now, the mirror moves in the direction of the light path of incident light. In the formula on incident light, λ is constant. And c & f will be variables. And in the formula on reflected light, c is constant. And f & λ will be variables.
0pt
0pt
2023/02/18 19:24
Propagated of light (2)
In outer space, a starlight is reflected by a mirror. There is a formula c = f λ. Now, the mirror is stationary. In comparing of incident light and reflected light, f is the same. And usually, c & λ are different.
Now, the mirror moves in the direction of the light path of incident light. In the formula on incident light, λ is constant. And c & f will be variables. And in the formula on reflected light, c is constant. And f & λ will be variables.
0pt0pt
10nakayama 2023/02/23 10:11
Selected Posts on Anti-Relativity (3)
◎ Light Clock
A light clock is working in a moving passenger car. In books or in other illustrations, light travels back and forth vertically, but this light clock slightly leans to the right or left. So, the zigzag (sawtooth) of light path seen by an observer on the ground warps. Two kinds of dilations ? And how about if two light clocks with different lean work ?
◎ Time Dilation
In outer space, a spaceship is sailing horizontally. Plane wave of light (wavelength is constant) of the first-magnitude star Sirius is coming from directly above. Phenomenon of time dilation can not be valid.
◎ Relativity of Simultaneity
On the Moon's surface, a passenger car is moving to the right. From the center of the ceiling of the car, light rays are emitted to directly below and diagonally downward to left and right at 45 degrees. And three points of light are reflected on the floor. Three points are symmetrical to observer on the Moon's surface also. Relativity of simultaneity will be invalid.
◎ Perihelion Shift of Mercury
The perihelion shift moves in one direction and its speed seems to be almost constant. Like the hands of a clock. Main cause of the shift seems not to be gravity of other planets. Main cause will be two-body problem of Mercury and Sun. Not as points, but as spheres.
0pt
0pt
2023/02/23 10:11
Selected Posts on Anti-Relativity (3)
◎ Light Clock
A light clock is working in a moving passenger car. In books or in other illustrations, light travels back and forth vertically, but this light clock slightly leans to the right or left. So, the zigzag (sawtooth) of light path seen by an observer on the ground warps. Two kinds of dilations ? And how about if two light clocks with different lean work ?
◎ Time Dilation
In outer space, a spaceship is sailing horizontally. Plane wave of light (wavelength is constant) of the first-magnitude star Sirius is coming from directly above. Phenomenon of time dilation can not be valid.
◎ Relativity of Simultaneity
On the Moon's surface, a passenger car is moving to the right. From the center of the ceiling of the car, light rays are emitted to directly below and diagonally downward to left and right at 45 degrees. And three points of light are reflected on the floor. Three points are symmetrical to observer on the Moon's surface also. Relativity of simultaneity will be invalid.
◎ Perihelion Shift of Mercury
The perihelion shift moves in one direction and its speed seems to be almost constant. Like the hands of a clock. Main cause of the shift seems not to be gravity of other planets. Main cause will be two-body problem of Mercury and Sun. Not as points, but as spheres.
0pt0pt
11nakayama 2023/02/23 11:08
Selected Posts on Anti-Relativity (3)
◎ Light Clock
A light clock is working in a moving passenger car. In books or in other illustrations, light travels back and forth vertically, but this light clock slightly leans to the right or left. So, the zigzag (sawtooth) of light path seen by an observer on the ground warps. Two kinds of dilations ? And how about if two light clocks with different lean work ?
◎ Time Dilation
In outer space, a spaceship is sailing horizontally. Plane wave of light (wavelength is constant) of the first-magnitude star Sirius is coming from directly above. Phenomenon of time dilation can not be valid.
◎ Relativity of Simultaneity
On the Moon's surface, a passenger car is moving to the right. From the center of the ceiling of the car, light rays are emitted to directly below and diagonally downward to left and right at 45 degrees. And three points of light are reflected on the floor. Three points are symmetrical to observer on the Moon's surface also. Relativity of simultaneity will be invalid.
◎ Perihelion Shift of Mercury
The perihelion shift moves in one direction and its speed seems to be almost constant. Like the hands of a clock. Main cause of the shift seems not to be gravity of other planets. Main cause will be two-body problem of Mercury and Sun. Not as points, but as spheres.
0pt
0pt
2023/02/23 11:08
Selected Posts on Anti-Relativity (3)
◎ Light Clock
A light clock is working in a moving passenger car. In books or in other illustrations, light travels back and forth vertically, but this light clock slightly leans to the right or left. So, the zigzag (sawtooth) of light path seen by an observer on the ground warps. Two kinds of dilations ? And how about if two light clocks with different lean work ?
◎ Time Dilation
In outer space, a spaceship is sailing horizontally. Plane wave of light (wavelength is constant) of the first-magnitude star Sirius is coming from directly above. Phenomenon of time dilation can not be valid.
◎ Relativity of Simultaneity
On the Moon's surface, a passenger car is moving to the right. From the center of the ceiling of the car, light rays are emitted to directly below and diagonally downward to left and right at 45 degrees. And three points of light are reflected on the floor. Three points are symmetrical to observer on the Moon's surface also. Relativity of simultaneity will be invalid.
◎ Perihelion Shift of Mercury
The perihelion shift moves in one direction and its speed seems to be almost constant. Like the hands of a clock. Main cause of the shift seems not to be gravity of other planets. Main cause will be two-body problem of Mercury and Sun. Not as points, but as spheres.
0pt0pt
12nakayama 2023/02/25 16:40
Selected Posts on Anti-Relatiyity (4)
◎ Speed of Light
For speed of light, the constant speed, and the formula c = fλ seem to be all. But is it really that simple?
A beam of light is propagating through aether. An observer is in uniform linear motion at various angles relative to this beam. The speed of the observer relative to aether also varies. Observer's motion can be accelerated motion, jerk motion, or curvilinear motion. Also, speed of light wave and light ray (photon) will generally be different.
No, to light, special treatment must not be given. Then, all must be simple.
◎ Aether
In outer space, frequency and wavelength of two stars light are being measured. Two stars are in opposite directions (antipodal point) on the celestial sphere, and the measurements are done simultaneously. The sum of the two values will be 2c or a constant close to 2c.
The above will show the motion of the observer relative to aether.
◎ Accelerated Motion and Aether
Accelerated motion will be absolute motion against aether. Accelerated motion and inertial force are two sides of the same coin. Gravity is not involved and is irrelevant.
That is, we are surrounded by aether.
◎ Acceleration and Non-Acceleration
The passenger car is accelerating uniformly to the right. In this car, a ray of light (frequency is constant) is emitted from the rear to the front. The number of light waves existing inside the car will be higher than when the car is stationary. That is, there will be apparent difference between non-acceleration and acceleration.
Ray of light is emitted from the ceiling of the passenger car downward. If the passenger car is accelerating, the ray draw a parabola. That is, there will be apparent difference between non-acceleration and acceleration.
◎ Local Inertial Frame
An elevator-like but homogeneous rectangular body is in free falling. Suppose this body consists of many local area of mass m. So, inertial force acting on each local area is mg. That is, local inertial frame will be impossible.
Gravity and inertial force are cancelled out partially or sometimes totally. But, it is action that cancelled out, not existence.
0pt
0pt
2023/02/25 16:40
Selected Posts on Anti-Relatiyity (4)
◎ Speed of Light
For speed of light, the constant speed, and the formula c = fλ seem to be all. But is it really that simple?
A beam of light is propagating through aether. An observer is in uniform linear motion at various angles relative to this beam. The speed of the observer relative to aether also varies. Observer's motion can be accelerated motion, jerk motion, or curvilinear motion. Also, speed of light wave and light ray (photon) will generally be different.
No, to light, special treatment must not be given. Then, all must be simple.
◎ Aether
In outer space, frequency and wavelength of two stars light are being measured. Two stars are in opposite directions (antipodal point) on the celestial sphere, and the measurements are done simultaneously. The sum of the two values will be 2c or a constant close to 2c.
The above will show the motion of the observer relative to aether.
◎ Accelerated Motion and Aether
Accelerated motion will be absolute motion against aether. Accelerated motion and inertial force are two sides of the same coin. Gravity is not involved and is irrelevant.
That is, we are surrounded by aether.
◎ Acceleration and Non-Acceleration
The passenger car is accelerating uniformly to the right. In this car, a ray of light (frequency is constant) is emitted from the rear to the front. The number of light waves existing inside the car will be higher than when the car is stationary. That is, there will be apparent difference between non-acceleration and acceleration.
Ray of light is emitted from the ceiling of the passenger car downward. If the passenger car is accelerating, the ray draw a parabola. That is, there will be apparent difference between non-acceleration and acceleration.
◎ Local Inertial Frame
An elevator-like but homogeneous rectangular body is in free falling. Suppose this body consists of many local area of mass m. So, inertial force acting on each local area is mg. That is, local inertial frame will be impossible.
Gravity and inertial force are cancelled out partially or sometimes totally. But, it is action that cancelled out, not existence.
0pt0pt
13nakayama 2023/02/25 16:44
Selected Posts on Anti-Relatiyity (4)
◎ Speed of Light
For speed of light, the constant speed, and the formula c = fλ seem to be all. But is it really that simple?
A beam of light is propagating through aether. An observer is in uniform linear motion at various angles relative to this beam. The speed of the observer relative to aether also varies. Observer's motion can be accelerated motion, jerk motion, or curvilinear motion. Also, speed of light wave and light ray (photon) will generally be different.
No, to light, special treatment must not be given. Then, all must be simple.
◎ Aether
In outer space, frequency and wavelength of two stars light are being measured. Two stars are in opposite directions (antipodal point) on the celestial sphere, and the measurements are done simultaneously. The sum of the two values will be 2c or a constant close to 2c.
The above will show the motion of the observer relative to aether.
◎ Accelerated Motion and Aether
Accelerated motion will be absolute motion against aether. Accelerated motion and inertial force are two sides of the same coin. Gravity is not involved and is irrelevant.
That is, we are surrounded by aether.
◎ Acceleration and Non-Acceleration
The passenger car is accelerating uniformly to the right. In this car, a ray of light (frequency is constant) is emitted from the rear to the front. The number of light waves existing inside the car will be higher than when the car is stationary. That is, there will be apparent difference between non-acceleration and acceleration.
Ray of light is emitted from the ceiling of the passenger car downward. If the passenger car is accelerating, the ray draw a parabola. That is, there will be apparent difference between non-acceleration and acceleration.
◎ Local Inertial Frame
An elevator-like but homogeneous rectangular body is in free falling. Suppose this body consists of many local area of mass m. So, inertial force acting on each local area is mg. That is, local inertial frame will be impossible.
Gravity and inertial force are cancelled out partially or sometimes totally. But, it is action that cancelled out, not existence.
0pt
0pt
2023/02/25 16:44
Selected Posts on Anti-Relatiyity (4)
◎ Speed of Light
For speed of light, the constant speed, and the formula c = fλ seem to be all. But is it really that simple?
A beam of light is propagating through aether. An observer is in uniform linear motion at various angles relative to this beam. The speed of the observer relative to aether also varies. Observer's motion can be accelerated motion, jerk motion, or curvilinear motion. Also, speed of light wave and light ray (photon) will generally be different.
No, to light, special treatment must not be given. Then, all must be simple.
◎ Aether
In outer space, frequency and wavelength of two stars light are being measured. Two stars are in opposite directions (antipodal point) on the celestial sphere, and the measurements are done simultaneously. The sum of the two values will be 2c or a constant close to 2c.
The above will show the motion of the observer relative to aether.
◎ Accelerated Motion and Aether
Accelerated motion will be absolute motion against aether. Accelerated motion and inertial force are two sides of the same coin. Gravity is not involved and is irrelevant.
That is, we are surrounded by aether.
◎ Acceleration and Non-Acceleration
The passenger car is accelerating uniformly to the right. In this car, a ray of light (frequency is constant) is emitted from the rear to the front. The number of light waves existing inside the car will be higher than when the car is stationary. That is, there will be apparent difference between non-acceleration and acceleration.
Ray of light is emitted from the ceiling of the passenger car downward. If the passenger car is accelerating, the ray draw a parabola. That is, there will be apparent difference between non-acceleration and acceleration.
◎ Local Inertial Frame
An elevator-like but homogeneous rectangular body is in free falling. Suppose this body consists of many local area of mass m. So, inertial force acting on each local area is mg. That is, local inertial frame will be impossible.
Gravity and inertial force are cancelled out partially or sometimes totally. But, it is action that cancelled out, not existence.
0pt0pt
14nakayama 2023/03/06 15:37
Selected Posts on Anti-Relativity (5)
◎ Doppler Effect of Light
Frequency of incoming light varies with the motion of an observer. In the formula c = fλ, it is clear that the speed of light (for the observer) cannot be constant.
0pt
0pt
2023/03/06 15:37
Selected Posts on Anti-Relativity (5)
◎ Doppler Effect of Light
Frequency of incoming light varies with the motion of an observer. In the formula c = fλ, it is clear that the speed of light (for the observer) cannot be constant.
0pt0pt
15中山 2023/03/28 14:02
Selected post on Anti-Relativity (6)
◎ Spherical Shell Theorem
There are two figures A and B that draw Sun and Mercury. A shows Mercury on the line of action of gravity of Sun extending from the left. Distance between two stars is 50. In B, Mercury is divided into two hemispheres, left and right. The distance between center of sphere (of A) and the center of gravity of two hemispheres each is 1. In B, denominators of formula for magnitude of gravity are 49 and 51. And squared are 2401 and 2601.
Magnitude of gravity is 2500 in A and 2501 in B. Size of sphere seems to be related to magnitude of gravity. Spherical shell theorem will not be valid. Main reason for perihelion shift of Mercury will be its size.
Note) In this post, only gravity of Sun is under consideration.
◎ Perihelion Shift of Mercury
There is a figure of Mercury. Mercury is drawn as a circle. Plus, the center of it and an arc are drawn. This arc passes through the center and is extending symmetrically upward and downward. This arc is part of circle centered at the center of Sun that is located on the right of this figure. Therefore, the area of Mercury divided by the arc is left > right. Thus, actual magnitude of centrifugal force of Mercury due to its orbital motion will exceed the magnitude calculated as a point. Probably, this will be the main reason for perihelion shift of Mercury.
Note : For planets with satellites, perihelion shif seems to be larger. This will be due to centrifugal force.
Note : There must be more unknowns in perihelion shift.
3pt
1pt
2023/03/28 14:02
Selected post on Anti-Relativity (6)
◎ Spherical Shell Theorem
There are two figures A and B that draw Sun and Mercury. A shows Mercury on the line of action of gravity of Sun extending from the left. Distance between two stars is 50. In B, Mercury is divided into two hemispheres, left and right. The distance between center of sphere (of A) and the center of gravity of two hemispheres each is 1. In B, denominators of formula for magnitude of gravity are 49 and 51. And squared are 2401 and 2601.
Magnitude of gravity is 2500 in A and 2501 in B. Size of sphere seems to be related to magnitude of gravity. Spherical shell theorem will not be valid. Main reason for perihelion shift of Mercury will be its size.
Note) In this post, only gravity of Sun is under consideration.
◎ Perihelion Shift of Mercury
There is a figure of Mercury. Mercury is drawn as a circle. Plus, the center of it and an arc are drawn. This arc passes through the center and is extending symmetrically upward and downward. This arc is part of circle centered at the center of Sun that is located on the right of this figure. Therefore, the area of Mercury divided by the arc is left > right. Thus, actual magnitude of centrifugal force of Mercury due to its orbital motion will exceed the magnitude calculated as a point. Probably, this will be the main reason for perihelion shift of Mercury.
Note : For planets with satellites, perihelion shif seems to be larger. This will be due to centrifugal force.
Note : There must be more unknowns in perihelion shift.
3pt1pt
16中山 2023/03/29 10:27
Selected Post on Anti-Relativity (7)
◎ Perihelion Shift of Mercury (problem posing)
I said earlier that this story should start from aphelion, not perihelion. Yes, size of Mercury will increase centrifugal force and will rotate the orbit of Mercury in the direction of revolution. It will also increase size of orbit and increase momentum of Mercury.
Moon is said to be receding away from Earth. Although it is on order of a few centimeters per year. There are not a few sites on web. Many of them say that reason is slowing down of rotation of Earth. And total angular momentum of Earth and Moon must be conserved. But is relationship between Earth and Moon still the same today ? I guess what I said in the first half of this post applies to Moon as well.
Note: Said only qualitatively.
6pt
0pt
2023/03/29 10:27
Selected Post on Anti-Relativity (7)
◎ Perihelion Shift of Mercury (problem posing)
I said earlier that this story should start from aphelion, not perihelion. Yes, size of Mercury will increase centrifugal force and will rotate the orbit of Mercury in the direction of revolution. It will also increase size of orbit and increase momentum of Mercury.
Moon is said to be receding away from Earth. Although it is on order of a few centimeters per year. There are not a few sites on web. Many of them say that reason is slowing down of rotation of Earth. And total angular momentum of Earth and Moon must be conserved. But is relationship between Earth and Moon still the same today ? I guess what I said in the first half of this post applies to Moon as well.
Note: Said only qualitatively.
6pt0pt
17名前を書き忘れた受験生 2023/03/29 11:45
The Michelson-Morley experiment was actually performed in a vacuum, not in air. The experiment was designed to detect the hypothetical "ether wind" that was thought to exist in the 19th century as the medium through which light waves propagated. The experiment aimed to measure the difference in the speed of light in different directions, as the Earth moves through the ether.
However, the results of the experiment showed that there was no measurable difference in the speed of light in different directions, which was contrary to what was expected if the ether theory was correct. This was a significant result, as it provided evidence against the existence of the ether and paved the way for the development of the theory of special relativity.
Regarding your statement that "in air, light is propagated at c/n", this is not entirely accurate. The speed of light in a medium, such as air or water, is indeed slower than its speed in a vacuum, but it is not simply equal to c/n. The speed of light in a medium depends on several factors, including the refractive index of the medium, which determines the degree to which light is bent as it passes through the medium.
Finally, the quote from Pauli's book is not in conflict with the results of the Michelson-Morley experiment. The quote is referring to an observer moving with the medium, which is different from the motion of the Earth through the ether that the experiment was designed to detect. In the context of the experiment, the motion of the observer is not relevant, as the aim was to measure the speed of light relative to the ether.
17pt
0pt
2023/03/29 11:45
The Michelson-Morley experiment was actually performed in a vacuum, not in air. The experiment was designed to detect the hypothetical "ether wind" that was thought to exist in the 19th century as the medium through which light waves propagated. The experiment aimed to measure the difference in the speed of light in different directions, as the Earth moves through the ether.
However, the results of the experiment showed that there was no measurable difference in the speed of light in different directions, which was contrary to what was expected if the ether theory was correct. This was a significant result, as it provided evidence against the existence of the ether and paved the way for the development of the theory of special relativity.
Regarding your statement that "in air, light is propagated at c/n", this is not entirely accurate. The speed of light in a medium, such as air or water, is indeed slower than its speed in a vacuum, but it is not simply equal to c/n. The speed of light in a medium depends on several factors, including the refractive index of the medium, which determines the degree to which light is bent as it passes through the medium.
Finally, the quote from Pauli's book is not in conflict with the results of the Michelson-Morley experiment. The quote is referring to an observer moving with the medium, which is different from the motion of the Earth through the ether that the experiment was designed to detect. In the context of the experiment, the motion of the observer is not relevant, as the aim was to measure the speed of light relative to the ether.
17pt0pt
18中山 2023/04/14 16:52
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (long axis)
Long axis of Mercury’s orbit is slowly rotating. That is, Mercury will follow an orbit outside its previous orbit after passing either perihelion or aphelion (for some extent). This is not so for perihelion in many figures.
4pt
0pt
2023/04/14 16:52
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (long axis)
Long axis of Mercury’s orbit is slowly rotating. That is, Mercury will follow an orbit outside its previous orbit after passing either perihelion or aphelion (for some extent). This is not so for perihelion in many figures.
4pt0pt
19中山 2023/04/14 16:56
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (Labyrinth)
This problem could be discribed as a problem in which Mercury’s elliptical orbit rotates slightly in the direction of Mercury’s orbital motion. Like hands of a clock. Reason for rotation may be due to the fact that Mercury is not a point but a sphere that has a size (mass distribution). But beyond that, it is a labyrinth for me.
Is the reason for rotation lies in perihelion or in aphelion ? Or is it in neither ? And, if the reason lies in aphelion, is it due to addition of centrifugal force ? Or is it due to weakening of gravitational pull of Sun ?
9pt
0pt
2023/04/14 16:56
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (Labyrinth)
This problem could be discribed as a problem in which Mercury’s elliptical orbit rotates slightly in the direction of Mercury’s orbital motion. Like hands of a clock. Reason for rotation may be due to the fact that Mercury is not a point but a sphere that has a size (mass distribution). But beyond that, it is a labyrinth for me.
Is the reason for rotation lies in perihelion or in aphelion ? Or is it in neither ? And, if the reason lies in aphelion, is it due to addition of centrifugal force ? Or is it due to weakening of gravitational pull of Sun ?
9pt0pt
20中山 2023/04/14 16:59
Equivalence principle (as an impression)
In laboratory experiment, inertial force is something that we can control. In a laboratory called thought experiment, we can control falling of an elevator cabin also. On the other hand, it seems that gravity is beyond our reach. In other words, inertial force and gravity will be different things.
Even outside laboratory (whether within our reach or not), inertial force and gravity may be different thing.
6pt
0pt
2023/04/14 16:59
Equivalence principle (as an impression)
In laboratory experiment, inertial force is something that we can control. In a laboratory called thought experiment, we can control falling of an elevator cabin also. On the other hand, it seems that gravity is beyond our reach. In other words, inertial force and gravity will be different things.
Even outside laboratory (whether within our reach or not), inertial force and gravity may be different thing.
6pt0pt
21中山 2023/04/14 17:02
Equivalence Principle
Two bodies of the same mass m tied by a fairly long string are in free fall to Jupiter. Two bodeies are back and forth, and increasing tension of the string is informed to Earth. Inertial force and gravity are different things.
Comet Shoemaker-Levy, which fell to Jupiter in 1994. It was broken into at least 21 pieces in falling.
16pt
0pt
2023/04/14 17:02
Equivalence Principle
Two bodies of the same mass m tied by a fairly long string are in free fall to Jupiter. Two bodeies are back and forth, and increasing tension of the string is informed to Earth. Inertial force and gravity are different things.
Comet Shoemaker-Levy, which fell to Jupiter in 1994. It was broken into at least 21 pieces in falling.
16pt0pt
22中山 2023/04/15 09:03
To 17,
There is a word "extinction" in a book Special Relativity by French, A.P. 1968. It's written as follows (original text ; quoted from "Google book" ; in 5-2). "Thus, for example, with visible light, a thickness of about 10-5cm of glass or 0.1mm of air at atmospheric pressure is almost enough to erase any possible memory, as it were, of the motion of the original source" (10-5cm is 0.0001mm). What ?? Light speed will be equalized in medium !
【Extinction : Michelson-Morley experiment (done in air) is nonsense 】 Above passage says that 0.1mm of air is enough to extinction.
7pt
0pt
2023/04/15 09:03
To 17,
There is a word "extinction" in a book Special Relativity by French, A.P. 1968. It's written as follows (original text ; quoted from "Google book" ; in 5-2). "Thus, for example, with visible light, a thickness of about 10-5cm of glass or 0.1mm of air at atmospheric pressure is almost enough to erase any possible memory, as it were, of the motion of the original source" (10-5cm is 0.0001mm). What ?? Light speed will be equalized in medium !
【Extinction : Michelson-Morley experiment (done in air) is nonsense 】 Above passage says that 0.1mm of air is enough to extinction.
7pt0pt
23中山 2023/04/15 15:08
To 17,
Constancy of speed of light (Reexamination)
Constancy of speed of light is not possible always. No, it will be
possible limitedly in the following two events only. Btw, speed of
light in mediums is not subject of this reexamination.
1) A measurement point and a light source are stationary in the same
inertial frame. Distance between the two is within a few light
seconds. Speed of light is c.
2) A measurement point is stationary in aether frame. Light
propagated in aether is coming to this point. Distance from the
light source is more than a few light sveconds. Speed of light will
not be c.
6pt
0pt
2023/04/15 15:08
To 17,
Constancy of speed of light (Reexamination)
Constancy of speed of light is not possible always. No, it will be
possible limitedly in the following two events only. Btw, speed of
light in mediums is not subject of this reexamination.
1) A measurement point and a light source are stationary in the same
inertial frame. Distance between the two is within a few light
seconds. Speed of light is c.
2) A measurement point is stationary in aether frame. Light
propagated in aether is coming to this point. Distance from the
light source is more than a few light sveconds. Speed of light will
not be c.
6pt0pt
24中山 2023/04/15 17:13
To 17,
Speed of Light
For speed of light, the constant speed, and the formula c = fλ seem to be all. But is it really so simple?
A beam of light is propagating through aether. An observer is in uniform linear motion at various angles relative to this beam. The speed of the observer relative to aether also varies. Observer’s motion can be accelerated motion, jerk motion, or curvilinear motion. Also, speed of light wave and light ray (photon) will generally be different.
No, to light, special treatment must not be given. Then, all must be simple.
8pt
0pt
2023/04/15 17:13
To 17,
Speed of Light
For speed of light, the constant speed, and the formula c = fλ seem to be all. But is it really so simple?
A beam of light is propagating through aether. An observer is in uniform linear motion at various angles relative to this beam. The speed of the observer relative to aether also varies. Observer’s motion can be accelerated motion, jerk motion, or curvilinear motion. Also, speed of light wave and light ray (photon) will generally be different.
No, to light, special treatment must not be given. Then, all must be simple.
8pt0pt
25名前を書き忘れた受験生 2023/04/16 02:54
While the formula c = fλ provides a straightforward relationship between the speed of light, its frequency, and wavelength, the behavior of light can become more complex when it interacts with different materials and environments.
In particular, the concept of the aether as a medium through which light waves propagate has been largely discredited by experimental evidence, including the Michelson-Morley experiment. Instead, it is now widely accepted that light waves can travel through a vacuum without requiring a medium.
When an observer moves relative to a light source, they will measure a different speed of light than an observer who is stationary relative to the source. This is due to the relativistic effects of time dilation and length contraction, which are described by the theory of special relativity.
Moreover, the behavior of light can be affected by gravitational fields, leading to phenomena such as gravitational lensing. In addition, the wave-particle duality of light means that it can exhibit both wave-like and particle-like behavior, depending on the context in which it is observed.
While the basic principles governing the behavior of light can be summarized by simple equations, the full range of phenomena exhibited by light can be quite complex and fascinating.
8pt
0pt
2023/04/16 02:54
While the formula c = fλ provides a straightforward relationship between the speed of light, its frequency, and wavelength, the behavior of light can become more complex when it interacts with different materials and environments.
In particular, the concept of the aether as a medium through which light waves propagate has been largely discredited by experimental evidence, including the Michelson-Morley experiment. Instead, it is now widely accepted that light waves can travel through a vacuum without requiring a medium.
When an observer moves relative to a light source, they will measure a different speed of light than an observer who is stationary relative to the source. This is due to the relativistic effects of time dilation and length contraction, which are described by the theory of special relativity.
Moreover, the behavior of light can be affected by gravitational fields, leading to phenomena such as gravitational lensing. In addition, the wave-particle duality of light means that it can exhibit both wave-like and particle-like behavior, depending on the context in which it is observed.
While the basic principles governing the behavior of light can be summarized by simple equations, the full range of phenomena exhibited by light can be quite complex and fascinating.
8pt0pt
26中山 2023/04/16 08:59
To 25,
Light is Propagated in Two Ways
In outer space, a starlight is reflected by a mirror. There is a formula c = f λ. Now, the mirror is stationary. In comparing of incident light and reflected light, f is the same. And usually, c & λ are different.
Now, the mirror moves in the direction of the light path of incident light. In the formula on incident light, λ is constant. And c & f will be variables. And in the formula on reflected light, c is constant. And f & λ will be variables.
6pt
0pt
2023/04/16 08:59
To 25,
Light is Propagated in Two Ways
In outer space, a starlight is reflected by a mirror. There is a formula c = f λ. Now, the mirror is stationary. In comparing of incident light and reflected light, f is the same. And usually, c & λ are different.
Now, the mirror moves in the direction of the light path of incident light. In the formula on incident light, λ is constant. And c & f will be variables. And in the formula on reflected light, c is constant. And f & λ will be variables.
6pt0pt
27中山 2023/04/16 12:01
To 25,
Speed of Light
When an observer moves relative to aether, they will measure a different speed of light than an observer who is stationary relative to aether.
4pt
0pt
2023/04/16 12:01
To 25,
Speed of Light
When an observer moves relative to aether, they will measure a different speed of light than an observer who is stationary relative to aether.
4pt0pt
28中山 2023/04/16 12:09
To 25,
Aberration shows aether
Aberration is caused by various motions of Earth relative to stationary aether (uniform isotropic). Light that enters upper air of Earth (from aether) is bent in the direction of motion of Earth. As a phenomenon, aberration is completed in the upper air. The same as refraction.
Therefore, illustration of raindrops and an umbrella is NG. Result of Airy’s experiment with a water-filled telescope is only natural. It is said that apparent displacement of stars is displaced in the direction of Earth’s motion, but in fact, it will be the opposite. You can check this by drawing light bending (in upper air) on a paper.
4pt
0pt
2023/04/16 12:09
To 25,
Aberration shows aether
Aberration is caused by various motions of Earth relative to stationary aether (uniform isotropic). Light that enters upper air of Earth (from aether) is bent in the direction of motion of Earth. As a phenomenon, aberration is completed in the upper air. The same as refraction.
Therefore, illustration of raindrops and an umbrella is NG. Result of Airy’s experiment with a water-filled telescope is only natural. It is said that apparent displacement of stars is displaced in the direction of Earth’s motion, but in fact, it will be the opposite. You can check this by drawing light bending (in upper air) on a paper.
4pt0pt
29中山 2023/04/16 12:09
To 25,
Aberration shows aether
Aberration is caused by various motions of Earth relative to stationary aether (uniform isotropic). Light that enters upper air of Earth (from aether) is bent in the direction of motion of Earth. As a phenomenon, aberration is completed in the upper air. The same as refraction.
Therefore, illustration of raindrops and an umbrella is NG. Result of Airy’s experiment with a water-filled telescope is only natural. It is said that apparent displacement of stars is displaced in the direction of Earth’s motion, but in fact, it will be the opposite. You can check this by drawing light bending (in upper air) on a paper.
4pt
0pt
2023/04/16 12:09
To 25,
Aberration shows aether
Aberration is caused by various motions of Earth relative to stationary aether (uniform isotropic). Light that enters upper air of Earth (from aether) is bent in the direction of motion of Earth. As a phenomenon, aberration is completed in the upper air. The same as refraction.
Therefore, illustration of raindrops and an umbrella is NG. Result of Airy’s experiment with a water-filled telescope is only natural. It is said that apparent displacement of stars is displaced in the direction of Earth’s motion, but in fact, it will be the opposite. You can check this by drawing light bending (in upper air) on a paper.
4pt0pt
30中山 2023/04/16 12:15
To 25,
Aether
In outer space, frequency and wavelength of two stars light are being measured. Two stars are in opposite directions (antipodal point) on the celestial sphere, and the measurements are done simultaneously. The sum of the two values will be 2c or a constant close to 2c.
The above will show the motion of the observer relative to aether.
3pt
0pt
2023/04/16 12:15
To 25,
Aether
In outer space, frequency and wavelength of two stars light are being measured. Two stars are in opposite directions (antipodal point) on the celestial sphere, and the measurements are done simultaneously. The sum of the two values will be 2c or a constant close to 2c.
The above will show the motion of the observer relative to aether.
3pt0pt
31中山 2023/04/16 16:19
To 25,
Constancy of Speed of Light
As to constancy of speed of light, case 1) in the post 23 is the only case we know. About case 2), we do not even admit existence of aether.
4pt
0pt
2023/04/16 16:19
To 25,
Constancy of Speed of Light
As to constancy of speed of light, case 1) in the post 23 is the only case we know. About case 2), we do not even admit existence of aether.
4pt0pt
32中山 2023/04/23 11:00
Color Difference in Visible Light
Difference in colors of visible light are said to be due to difference in wavelength. But frequency is also different. Why is it wavelength and not frequency ? I have no recollection seeing an explanation on it.
A light beam (monochromatic laser) is emitted from a light source into water and air. Frequency in both media is the same, but wavelength is different. What is color development of color film exposed in both media ?
8pt
0pt
2023/04/23 11:00
Color Difference in Visible Light
Difference in colors of visible light are said to be due to difference in wavelength. But frequency is also different. Why is it wavelength and not frequency ? I have no recollection seeing an explanation on it.
A light beam (monochromatic laser) is emitted from a light source into water and air. Frequency in both media is the same, but wavelength is different. What is color development of color film exposed in both media ?
8pt0pt
33名前を書き忘れた受験生 2023/04/23 18:44
I'm sorry, but the concept of a stationary aether has been largely discredited by experimental evidence, including the Michelson-Morley experiment. The phenomenon of aberration can be explained without invoking the existence of an aether. It is a consequence of the finite speed of light and the relative motion between the observer and the light source. As the observer moves, the angle at which they observe the light changes due to the finite time it takes for the light to reach their eye.
Refraction of light in the upper atmosphere is a separate phenomenon that can also affect the apparent position of celestial objects, but it is not directly related to aberration. The displacement of stars due to aberration is indeed in the direction of the Earth's motion, not opposite to it.
While it is true that Airy's experiment demonstrated the effect of aberration using a water-filled telescope, this does not imply the existence of a stationary aether. The experiment was designed to measure the angle of starlight as it entered the telescope at different times of the year, providing evidence for the phenomenon of aberration.
In summary, aberration can be explained without invoking the concept of a stationary aether. It is a consequence of the finite speed of light and the relative motion between the observer and the light source.
10pt
1pt
2023/04/23 18:44
I'm sorry, but the concept of a stationary aether has been largely discredited by experimental evidence, including the Michelson-Morley experiment. The phenomenon of aberration can be explained without invoking the existence of an aether. It is a consequence of the finite speed of light and the relative motion between the observer and the light source. As the observer moves, the angle at which they observe the light changes due to the finite time it takes for the light to reach their eye.
Refraction of light in the upper atmosphere is a separate phenomenon that can also affect the apparent position of celestial objects, but it is not directly related to aberration. The displacement of stars due to aberration is indeed in the direction of the Earth's motion, not opposite to it.
While it is true that Airy's experiment demonstrated the effect of aberration using a water-filled telescope, this does not imply the existence of a stationary aether. The experiment was designed to measure the angle of starlight as it entered the telescope at different times of the year, providing evidence for the phenomenon of aberration.
In summary, aberration can be explained without invoking the concept of a stationary aether. It is a consequence of the finite speed of light and the relative motion between the observer and the light source.
10pt1pt
34中山 2023/04/24 14:21
To 33, Thank you for your reply about aether.
What causes aberration ? Core must be the position of light source on the celestial sphere. Fixed star's motion (also relative to Earth) is irrelevant. At all.
10pt
0pt
2023/04/24 14:21
To 33, Thank you for your reply about aether.
What causes aberration ? Core must be the position of light source on the celestial sphere. Fixed star's motion (also relative to Earth) is irrelevant. At all.
10pt0pt
35中山 2023/04/25 13:08
To33, Aberration on Mars
Annual aberration of Mars is mainly caused by Mars' orbital period : 1.881 years and average orbital speed : 24.07 km/sec. That is, by the motion of an observer repative to aether.
12pt
4pt
2023/04/25 13:08
To33, Aberration on Mars
Annual aberration of Mars is mainly caused by Mars' orbital period : 1.881 years and average orbital speed : 24.07 km/sec. That is, by the motion of an observer repative to aether.
12pt4pt
36中山 2023/04/29 13:03
Aether
In outer space, three pinhole cameras are pointed in X, Y and Z directions (these are in uniform linear motion, the same as Sun). Cameras are pretty large. In the camera, on the inner wall, on the opposite side of the pinhole, disks rotate once and receiving position of star lights are recorded.
Recorded position of star lights on three disks will not be true circle. These may indicate motion of the pinhole cameras relative to aether.
5pt
6pt
2023/04/29 13:03
Aether
In outer space, three pinhole cameras are pointed in X, Y and Z directions (these are in uniform linear motion, the same as Sun). Cameras are pretty large. In the camera, on the inner wall, on the opposite side of the pinhole, disks rotate once and receiving position of star lights are recorded.
Recorded position of star lights on three disks will not be true circle. These may indicate motion of the pinhole cameras relative to aether.
5pt6pt
37中山 2023/05/01 18:21
Three Pinhole Cameras
Otherday's my post(7) was misunderstanding. Sorry. Following is compensation.
In outer space, three pinhole cameras are moving at different constant speed in X direction. Size of celestial sphere reflected on the receiving surface in the cameras will be slightly different. This will be due to the different speed of the cameras relative to aether.
6pt
4pt
2023/05/01 18:21
Three Pinhole Cameras
Otherday's my post(7) was misunderstanding. Sorry. Following is compensation.
In outer space, three pinhole cameras are moving at different constant speed in X direction. Size of celestial sphere reflected on the receiving surface in the cameras will be slightly different. This will be due to the different speed of the cameras relative to aether.
6pt4pt
38中山 2023/05/04 09:04
Apology and Cancellation
My recent posts 36 and 37 seem to be invalid. Sorry.
6pt
1pt
2023/05/04 09:04
Apology and Cancellation
My recent posts 36 and 37 seem to be invalid. Sorry.
6pt1pt
39中山 2023/05/05 08:59
Pinhole Camera
In outer space, a starlight is coming from the right. This ray enters the pinhole of a pinhole camera and is reflected upward by a mirror set at 45 degrees upwards in the camera.
When the camera moves to the right or left (at a uniform speed), the position where reflected light hits the upper inner wall of the camera will move. Incident light is propagated in aether, and reflected light follows emission theory.
Note: c of lincident light and rleflected light relative to the mirror are generally different. So, angle of the two are also. λ are also).
4pt
0pt
2023/05/05 08:59
Pinhole Camera
In outer space, a starlight is coming from the right. This ray enters the pinhole of a pinhole camera and is reflected upward by a mirror set at 45 degrees upwards in the camera.
When the camera moves to the right or left (at a uniform speed), the position where reflected light hits the upper inner wall of the camera will move. Incident light is propagated in aether, and reflected light follows emission theory.
Note: c of lincident light and rleflected light relative to the mirror are generally different. So, angle of the two are also. λ are also).
4pt0pt
40中山 2023/05/06 12:49
Gravity (gravitational field) and Time
There is optical path of triangle *ABC with top A of tall tower and mirror BC placed on the ground (as vertices). Laser light emitted from light source set at A (frequency is constant) is reflected by BC and returns to A. Frequencies of laser light at ABC will be the same. There will be no time dilation due to gravity.
4pt
0pt
2023/05/06 12:49
Gravity (gravitational field) and Time
There is optical path of triangle *ABC with top A of tall tower and mirror BC placed on the ground (as vertices). Laser light emitted from light source set at A (frequency is constant) is reflected by BC and returns to A. Frequencies of laser light at ABC will be the same. There will be no time dilation due to gravity.
4pt0pt
41中山 2023/05/13 17:02
About Propagation of Light
Compare propagation of light with propagation of sound waves. Neither time nor space will require any transformation in our understanding of propagation of sound waves (in air or other medium). In this respect, there will be no difference between propagation of light and propagation of sound waves (if we accept aether as medium for light propagation).
6pt
0pt
2023/05/13 17:02
About Propagation of Light
Compare propagation of light with propagation of sound waves. Neither time nor space will require any transformation in our understanding of propagation of sound waves (in air or other medium). In this respect, there will be no difference between propagation of light and propagation of sound waves (if we accept aether as medium for light propagation).
6pt0pt
42中山 2023/05/13 17:13
Speed of Light is Various other
Plane waves of Sunlight are arriving horizontally from above to two passenger cars on Moon's surface. There is a small pinhole at the center of ceiling of two passenger cars, and on the floor, there is a spot of light that passed through pinhole.
The two passenger cars are moving on the Moon's surface at different speeds (in x direction). For an observer inside the passenger car, position of light spot on the floor will be different. This difference in position will be the same for an observer stands on the Moon's surface.
3pt
0pt
2023/05/13 17:13
Speed of Light is Various other
Plane waves of Sunlight are arriving horizontally from above to two passenger cars on Moon's surface. There is a small pinhole at the center of ceiling of two passenger cars, and on the floor, there is a spot of light that passed through pinhole.
The two passenger cars are moving on the Moon's surface at different speeds (in x direction). For an observer inside the passenger car, position of light spot on the floor will be different. This difference in position will be the same for an observer stands on the Moon's surface.
3pt0pt
43中山 2023/05/17 08:29
Two Formulas for Speed of Light (in vacuum)
First formula, v=fλ: It is speed of light relative to aether, and v is constant. Area is where light follows aether frame. That is, more than a few light seconds away from light source.
Second formula, c=fλ; It is speed of light relative to light source, and c is constant. Area is where light follows emission theory. That is, within a few light seconds from light source.
Note) First formula is the same as formula for the speed of sound in air (depending on f and λ).
Note) In outer space, a starlight is passing through a tube. In the center of the tube, a plate of glass is placed. In front of the glass, the starlight follows aether frame, and in back of it, starlight follows emission theory.
Note) A starlight is moving in aether. It is possible that v and c move at the same speed. Usually, v will be below c.
Note) For a moving observer, speed of light must be reconsidered (starting with the Doppler effect).
5pt
0pt
2023/05/17 08:29
Two Formulas for Speed of Light (in vacuum)
First formula, v=fλ: It is speed of light relative to aether, and v is constant. Area is where light follows aether frame. That is, more than a few light seconds away from light source.
Second formula, c=fλ; It is speed of light relative to light source, and c is constant. Area is where light follows emission theory. That is, within a few light seconds from light source.
Note) First formula is the same as formula for the speed of sound in air (depending on f and λ).
Note) In outer space, a starlight is passing through a tube. In the center of the tube, a plate of glass is placed. In front of the glass, the starlight follows aether frame, and in back of it, starlight follows emission theory.
Note) A starlight is moving in aether. It is possible that v and c move at the same speed. Usually, v will be below c.
Note) For a moving observer, speed of light must be reconsidered (starting with the Doppler effect).
5pt0pt
44中山 2023/05/17 12:26
Correction (on today’s post : on the third note)
A starlight > A light source
3pt
0pt
2023/05/17 12:26
Correction (on today’s post : on the third note)
A starlight > A light source
3pt0pt
45中山 2023/05/19 11:54
Local Inertial Frame (again)
Every mass point is either in an inertial (unaccelerated) frame or accelerated frame. If a rigid homogeneous cuboid is in free-falling, every mass point is in accelerated frame. In this cuboid, there can be no inertial frame, even locally.
P.S. This difference is not fictitious but absolute.
6pt
0pt
2023/05/19 11:54
Local Inertial Frame (again)
Every mass point is either in an inertial (unaccelerated) frame or accelerated frame. If a rigid homogeneous cuboid is in free-falling, every mass point is in accelerated frame. In this cuboid, there can be no inertial frame, even locally.
P.S. This difference is not fictitious but absolute.
6pt0pt
46名前を書き忘れた受験生 2023/05/29 09:28
If the two passenger cars on the Moon's surface are moving at different speeds in the x-direction, the position of the light spot on the floor, as observed from within each car or by an observer on the Moon's surface, will indeed be different. This is due to the relative motion between the cars and the source of light (Sunlight in this case).
When the cars are moving at different speeds, the time it takes for the light to travel from the pinhole to the floor will be different for each car. As a result, the light spot on the floor will appear to be displaced horizontally, relative to a stationary reference point, such as the position it would have if the cars were not in motion.
This phenomenon can be explained by the principles of classical physics and does not require invoking any variations in the speed of light itself. The speed of light in a vacuum, as described by the constant "c" in the equation c = fλ, remains constant regardless of the relative motion between the source of light and an observer.
It's worth noting that in the context of special relativity, there are relativistic effects such as time dilation and length contraction that can come into play when considering the motion of observers and the propagation of light. However, for the scenario you described, the observed difference in the position of the light spot can be explained by classical physics without the need for considering such relativistic effects.
4pt
0pt
2023/05/29 09:28
If the two passenger cars on the Moon's surface are moving at different speeds in the x-direction, the position of the light spot on the floor, as observed from within each car or by an observer on the Moon's surface, will indeed be different. This is due to the relative motion between the cars and the source of light (Sunlight in this case).
When the cars are moving at different speeds, the time it takes for the light to travel from the pinhole to the floor will be different for each car. As a result, the light spot on the floor will appear to be displaced horizontally, relative to a stationary reference point, such as the position it would have if the cars were not in motion.
This phenomenon can be explained by the principles of classical physics and does not require invoking any variations in the speed of light itself. The speed of light in a vacuum, as described by the constant "c" in the equation c = fλ, remains constant regardless of the relative motion between the source of light and an observer.
It's worth noting that in the context of special relativity, there are relativistic effects such as time dilation and length contraction that can come into play when considering the motion of observers and the propagation of light. However, for the scenario you described, the observed difference in the position of the light spot can be explained by classical physics without the need for considering such relativistic effects.
4pt0pt
47中山 2023/05/30 12:52
To 46, > This is due to the relative motion between the cars and the source of light (Sunlight in this case).
Sorry, no ! This is due to not relative motion but absolute motion of the cars to aether. If position of light source is the same (on the celestial sphere), behovior of light in the cars must be the same.
Now, measuring tape is set on the floor of the cars. If the spot light in the car are 0.0a and -0.0b (distance from the center), this value will be the same to three observers (including the one standing on the moon's surface).
11pt
1pt
2023/05/30 12:52
To 46, > This is due to the relative motion between the cars and the source of light (Sunlight in this case).
Sorry, no ! This is due to not relative motion but absolute motion of the cars to aether. If position of light source is the same (on the celestial sphere), behovior of light in the cars must be the same.
Now, measuring tape is set on the floor of the cars. If the spot light in the car are 0.0a and -0.0b (distance from the center), this value will be the same to three observers (including the one standing on the moon's surface).
11pt1pt
48中山 2023/05/30 14:22
To 46, About latter part of your post, how about the scenario as follows ?
On the moon's surface, a passenger car is moving (in x direction). From a light source placed on the center of ceiling, light rays are emitted radially and symmetrically (in ten degrees increments). And on the floor, spots of light are reflected.
To an observer standing on the moon's surface, speed of light must not be constant.
5pt
0pt
2023/05/30 14:22
To 46, About latter part of your post, how about the scenario as follows ?
On the moon's surface, a passenger car is moving (in x direction). From a light source placed on the center of ceiling, light rays are emitted radially and symmetrically (in ten degrees increments). And on the floor, spots of light are reflected.
To an observer standing on the moon's surface, speed of light must not be constant.
5pt0pt
49中山 2023/06/05 15:34
Inertial Force and Gravity are Different Things
1) For inertial force, space is homogeneous isotropic. Gravity is not.
2) For inertial force, every position in space is the same. Gravity is not.
9pt
0pt
2023/06/05 15:34
Inertial Force and Gravity are Different Things
1) For inertial force, space is homogeneous isotropic. Gravity is not.
2) For inertial force, every position in space is the same. Gravity is not.
9pt0pt
50中山 2023/06/08 15:00
Local Inertial Frame (rewritten)
An elevator cabin is in free falling. Let's assume that every local frame of this cabin is the same (mass m). There can be no local inertial frame.
2pt
3pt
2023/06/08 15:00
Local Inertial Frame (rewritten)
An elevator cabin is in free falling. Let's assume that every local frame of this cabin is the same (mass m). There can be no local inertial frame.
2pt3pt
51中山 2023/06/14 08:56
Local Inertial Frame (additional)
A homogeneous cuboid made of atomic silver (atomic weight 107.9) is in free calling. Magnitude of inertial force acting on every silver atom is the same. There can be no local inertial frame.
5pt
2pt
2023/06/14 08:56
Local Inertial Frame (additional)
A homogeneous cuboid made of atomic silver (atomic weight 107.9) is in free calling. Magnitude of inertial force acting on every silver atom is the same. There can be no local inertial frame.
5pt2pt
52中山 2023/06/18 12:58
Inertial Force and Gravity are Different Things (rewritten)
◎ Inertia Force
1) Between inertial force and motion of a mass point in space, there will be direct connection.
2) Position in space has no meaning. Space is homogeneous isotropic.
3) Absolute space is required.
◎ Gravity
1) Between gravity and motion of a mass point in space, there will be no direct connection.
2) Position in space has meaning. As a gravitational field. Space is not homogeneous isotropic.
3) Absolute space is not required.
5pt
0pt
2023/06/18 12:58
Inertial Force and Gravity are Different Things (rewritten)
◎ Inertia Force
1) Between inertial force and motion of a mass point in space, there will be direct connection.
2) Position in space has no meaning. Space is homogeneous isotropic.
3) Absolute space is required.
◎ Gravity
1) Between gravity and motion of a mass point in space, there will be no direct connection.
2) Position in space has meaning. As a gravitational field. Space is not homogeneous isotropic.
3) Absolute space is not required.
5pt0pt
53中山 2023/06/22 15:18
Inertial Force and Gravity are Different Things (additional)
It is argued that inertial force and gravity are equivalent. However, in light of the followings, the two will not be equivalent. Even if vectors as action cancel each other out, vectors as existence do not disappear. Qualitatively, quantitatively. These are composition and decomposition of forces.
◎ Inertial force corresponds to accelerated motion of a mass point in homogeneous isotropic space.
◎ Gravity corresponds to position of a mass potint in space modified by gravitational fields.
3pt
0pt
2023/06/22 15:18
Inertial Force and Gravity are Different Things (additional)
It is argued that inertial force and gravity are equivalent. However, in light of the followings, the two will not be equivalent. Even if vectors as action cancel each other out, vectors as existence do not disappear. Qualitatively, quantitatively. These are composition and decomposition of forces.
◎ Inertial force corresponds to accelerated motion of a mass point in homogeneous isotropic space.
◎ Gravity corresponds to position of a mass potint in space modified by gravitational fields.
3pt0pt
54中山 2023/06/24 12:24
Inertial Force and Gravity are Different Things (additional)
In light of the followings, inertial force and gravity will not be equivalent.
◎ Inertial force: It is emerged in an accelerated motion (of a mass point) in space.
◎ Gravity: It does not emerge in an accelerated motion (of a mass point) in space.
2pt
1pt
2023/06/24 12:24
Inertial Force and Gravity are Different Things (additional)
In light of the followings, inertial force and gravity will not be equivalent.
◎ Inertial force: It is emerged in an accelerated motion (of a mass point) in space.
◎ Gravity: It does not emerge in an accelerated motion (of a mass point) in space.
2pt1pt
55中山 2023/06/26 14:19
"Gavitational Acceleration"
If magnitude of vector of gravity and another force (e.g. tension) is the same, body will show the same vector of acceleration. On idiom (compound word) "gravitational acceleration", sense of incongruity cannot be wiped out.
Idiom "gravitational acceleration" seems to be meaningful only in limited situationon. Free fall, gravity at the surface of Earth, etc. Is it an idiom of physics ?
If gravity and inertial force are different things, gravity and acceleration are also different things. Will there be qualification of idiom ?
4pt
0pt
2023/06/26 14:19
"Gavitational Acceleration"
If magnitude of vector of gravity and another force (e.g. tension) is the same, body will show the same vector of acceleration. On idiom (compound word) "gravitational acceleration", sense of incongruity cannot be wiped out.
Idiom "gravitational acceleration" seems to be meaningful only in limited situationon. Free fall, gravity at the surface of Earth, etc. Is it an idiom of physics ?
If gravity and inertial force are different things, gravity and acceleration are also different things. Will there be qualification of idiom ?
4pt0pt
56中山 2023/06/28 10:38
Inertial Force is not Fictitious
Gravity acts on a body as a vector. At a local area in free falling elevator, vector of gravity and vector of inertial force (vector of action, not of existence) will cancel each other. In that case, inertial force will not be fictitious.
2pt
0pt
2023/06/28 10:38
Inertial Force is not Fictitious
Gravity acts on a body as a vector. At a local area in free falling elevator, vector of gravity and vector of inertial force (vector of action, not of existence) will cancel each other. In that case, inertial force will not be fictitious.
2pt0pt
57中山 2023/07/01 16:22
Gravitational Acceleration
Well, "gravitational acceleration" is "magnitude of gravity on the surface of Earth ?" said an Alien
1pt
0pt
2023/07/01 16:22
Gravitational Acceleration
Well, "gravitational acceleration" is "magnitude of gravity on the surface of Earth ?" said an Alien
1pt0pt
58中山 2023/07/03 11:24
Centrifugal Force is not Fictitious
The same four spheres, connected to the ends of two rods are rotating on a plane (no friction). Asuume the bar as a cross and the whole as a disk. At any point on the rod, magnitudes of the centrifugal force and centripetal force are equal, as shown by Newton's third law of motion. That is, centrifugal force (and centripetal also) is not fictitious to an observer in any frame.
1pt
0pt
2023/07/03 11:24
Centrifugal Force is not Fictitious
The same four spheres, connected to the ends of two rods are rotating on a plane (no friction). Asuume the bar as a cross and the whole as a disk. At any point on the rod, magnitudes of the centrifugal force and centripetal force are equal, as shown by Newton's third law of motion. That is, centrifugal force (and centripetal also) is not fictitious to an observer in any frame.
1pt0pt
59中山 2023/07/03 11:44
Additional to 58
Original text of the third low is said, it is not on two bodies, but on every point of action of force.
1pt
0pt
2023/07/03 11:44
Additional to 58
Original text of the third low is said, it is not on two bodies, but on every point of action of force.
1pt0pt
60中山 2023/07/04 09:54
Inertial Resistance/Inertial Force
A mass point is placed in aether frame, but when it is forced to move other than uniform linear motion (including zero speed) relative to aether frame, it shows resistance called inertial resistance. Inertial resistance is commonly said to be inertial force. Inertial force will correspond to motion of the mass in aether frame, qualitatively, quantitatively.
2pt
0pt
2023/07/04 09:54
Inertial Resistance/Inertial Force
A mass point is placed in aether frame, but when it is forced to move other than uniform linear motion (including zero speed) relative to aether frame, it shows resistance called inertial resistance. Inertial resistance is commonly said to be inertial force. Inertial force will correspond to motion of the mass in aether frame, qualitatively, quantitatively.
2pt0pt
61中山 2023/07/04 14:27
Centrifugal Force is not Fictitious
Allow me to alter some of previous post. Previous setting was four spheres and two rods. Now,on two spheres and one rod (in X direction only), mass is two times (without deflection). Then,at close to the center, magnitude of centrifugal force and centripetal force will be about two times. Also, magnitude of centrifugal force and centripetal force will correspond to rotational speed.
2pt
0pt
2023/07/04 14:27
Centrifugal Force is not Fictitious
Allow me to alter some of previous post. Previous setting was four spheres and two rods. Now,on two spheres and one rod (in X direction only), mass is two times (without deflection). Then,at close to the center, magnitude of centrifugal force and centripetal force will be about two times. Also, magnitude of centrifugal force and centripetal force will correspond to rotational speed.
2pt0pt
62中山 2023/07/05 10:18
Centrifugal Force is not Fictitious
About centrifugal force, allow me to post onece more. A disk and the same ten spheres (evenly spaced around the disk) are rotating on a plane (no friction). Spheres and outer edge of the disk are connected with strings of the same length. Each string will show the same tension. Tension will be a sign that centrifugal force is not fictitious.
Note) Centrifugal force and centripetal force will work on the string (on every point) as Newton's third law of motion.
5pt
0pt
2023/07/05 10:18
Centrifugal Force is not Fictitious
About centrifugal force, allow me to post onece more. A disk and the same ten spheres (evenly spaced around the disk) are rotating on a plane (no friction). Spheres and outer edge of the disk are connected with strings of the same length. Each string will show the same tension. Tension will be a sign that centrifugal force is not fictitious.
Note) Centrifugal force and centripetal force will work on the string (on every point) as Newton's third law of motion.
5pt0pt
63中山 2023/07/07 08:29
Speed of Gravity Propagation
Speed of gravity propagation is said to be the same to speed of light. But is it true ? Something can't be found in thought experiments ? How about Sun and Mercury ? Solar system is said to move in the direction called sun facing point (on the celestial sphere). So position from which gravitational force of Sun acting Mercury will be the position some back in time. If so, this effect will slightly acuumlate (like free falling).
In Encyclopaedia Britannica 1969, there is a passage as follows (in item "Gravitation" ; original text). "If the action of gravitation were not absolutely instantaneous"(omission)"All experiments and observations were, however, consistent with the law, from the short distances employed in laboratory experiments to the long ranges used in interplanetary calculations". It says, action will be instantaneous.
2pt
0pt
2023/07/07 08:29
Speed of Gravity Propagation
Speed of gravity propagation is said to be the same to speed of light. But is it true ? Something can't be found in thought experiments ? How about Sun and Mercury ? Solar system is said to move in the direction called sun facing point (on the celestial sphere). So position from which gravitational force of Sun acting Mercury will be the position some back in time. If so, this effect will slightly acuumlate (like free falling).
In Encyclopaedia Britannica 1969, there is a passage as follows (in item "Gravitation" ; original text). "If the action of gravitation were not absolutely instantaneous"(omission)"All experiments and observations were, however, consistent with the law, from the short distances employed in laboratory experiments to the long ranges used in interplanetary calculations". It says, action will be instantaneous.
2pt0pt
64中山 2023/07/12 11:29
Speed of Light
This is supplement to the former post 1 (Speed of Light). Half of measurement results of speed of light waves will exceed c.
6pt
0pt
2023/07/12 11:29
Speed of Light
This is supplement to the former post 1 (Speed of Light). Half of measurement results of speed of light waves will exceed c.
6pt0pt
65中山 2023/07/18 09:55
Newton's Three Laws of Motion
Uniform linear motion (ether can be emerged in an optical way), uniform circular motion, inertial force, action and reaction are all existence graspable qualitatively and quantitatively. These are not fictitious.
3pt
0pt
2023/07/18 09:55
Newton's Three Laws of Motion
Uniform linear motion (ether can be emerged in an optical way), uniform circular motion, inertial force, action and reaction are all existence graspable qualitatively and quantitatively. These are not fictitious.
3pt0pt
66中山 2023/07/27 09:12
Spherical Shell Theorem (correction)
In my previous post (15), Mercury is divided into two spheres. But this thought experiment doesn't seem to hold. Surprising ! It does not disprove Newton's spherical shell theorem. So, my hope is shifted in another thought experiment on centrifugal force.
3pt
0pt
2023/07/27 09:12
Spherical Shell Theorem (correction)
In my previous post (15), Mercury is divided into two spheres. But this thought experiment doesn't seem to hold. Surprising ! It does not disprove Newton's spherical shell theorem. So, my hope is shifted in another thought experiment on centrifugal force.
3pt0pt
67中山 2023/07/28 08:01
Newton’s Spherical Shell Theorem (supplement)
◎ But this thought experiment (see 15) doesn’t seem to explain perihelion shift of Mercury. Because, m/49^2 + m/51^2 = 2m/50^2. Surprising !
◎ Another thought experiment is on centrifugal force (see also 15).
0pt
0pt
2023/07/28 08:01
Newton’s Spherical Shell Theorem (supplement)
◎ But this thought experiment (see 15) doesn’t seem to explain perihelion shift of Mercury. Because, m/49^2 + m/51^2 = 2m/50^2. Surprising !
◎ Another thought experiment is on centrifugal force (see also 15).
0pt0pt
68中山 2023/08/05 11:20
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (rewrittn)
In a figure, Mercury is drown as a circle. Plus, the figure shows the center of the circle and an arc extending upward and downward through the center (that is a part of orbit). Tne arc divides Mercury into left and right, and the area is left > right. This figure will show that actual magnitude of centrifugal force exceeds that calculated for Mercury as a point (see formula of centrifugal force). Perihelion shift of Mercury may be due to Mercury's size.
3pt
0pt
2023/08/05 11:20
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (rewrittn)
In a figure, Mercury is drown as a circle. Plus, the figure shows the center of the circle and an arc extending upward and downward through the center (that is a part of orbit). Tne arc divides Mercury into left and right, and the area is left > right. This figure will show that actual magnitude of centrifugal force exceeds that calculated for Mercury as a point (see formula of centrifugal force). Perihelion shift of Mercury may be due to Mercury's size.
3pt0pt
69中山 2023/08/22 11:30
Decelerated Motion
Constant tension is acting on a rope extending from a passenger car to the left, and passenger car is decelerating. Even if the ground speed of passenger car becomes zero due to deceleration, tension of the rope is constant. So passenger car starts accelerating to the left. But, there will be no difference in situation in before and after of passenger car. And, there will be no point significant in the ground speed of passenger car.
0pt
0pt
2023/08/22 11:30
Decelerated Motion
Constant tension is acting on a rope extending from a passenger car to the left, and passenger car is decelerating. Even if the ground speed of passenger car becomes zero due to deceleration, tension of the rope is constant. So passenger car starts accelerating to the left. But, there will be no difference in situation in before and after of passenger car. And, there will be no point significant in the ground speed of passenger car.
0pt0pt
70中山 2023/09/07 11:46
Peliherion Shift of Mercury
Moon is said to be moving away from Earth by several centimeters per year. I proposed formally (in 68), size of orbiting celestial body increases its centrifugal force (compared to calculated as a point). And so, it moves forward the long axis of elliptical orbit, and also it increases the length of long axis a little ? Is Mercury moving away from Sun too ?
3pt
0pt
2023/09/07 11:46
Peliherion Shift of Mercury
Moon is said to be moving away from Earth by several centimeters per year. I proposed formally (in 68), size of orbiting celestial body increases its centrifugal force (compared to calculated as a point). And so, it moves forward the long axis of elliptical orbit, and also it increases the length of long axis a little ? Is Mercury moving away from Sun too ?
3pt0pt
71中山 2023/09/08 15:02
Decelerated Motion
As written in 69, everything is accelerated motion and decelerated motion does not exist. But “counter-jerk motion” where degree of accelerated motion withdrawing may be possible.
1pt
0pt
2023/09/08 15:02
Decelerated Motion
As written in 69, everything is accelerated motion and decelerated motion does not exist. But “counter-jerk motion” where degree of accelerated motion withdrawing may be possible.
1pt0pt
72中山 2023/09/16 10:53
Perihelion Shift of Mercury
Size of Mercury will increase gravity and increase centrifugal force quolitatively also. Of the two, gravity is probably the main factor. Because, increase in gravity shift aphelion in the direction of revolution. On the other hand, increase in centrifugal force shift aphelion in the opposite direction of revolution.
The formula for gravity, F = mM/r^2, probably shows that magnitude of gravity is related to the size of Mercury (but surprisingly small).
1pt
0pt
2023/09/16 10:53
Perihelion Shift of Mercury
Size of Mercury will increase gravity and increase centrifugal force quolitatively also. Of the two, gravity is probably the main factor. Because, increase in gravity shift aphelion in the direction of revolution. On the other hand, increase in centrifugal force shift aphelion in the opposite direction of revolution.
The formula for gravity, F = mM/r^2, probably shows that magnitude of gravity is related to the size of Mercury (but surprisingly small).
1pt0pt
73中山 2023/09/17 13:44
Perihelion Shift of Mercury
There is one more problem. Size of Mercury receives surplus force. But where does this surplus force go ?
In figure of perihelion shift of Mercury,its destination seems not to be found. Ah, perhaps the same phenomenon as Moon's retreat (Moon's orbit is expanding) will be destination. This surplus force probably turns and expands Mercury's elliptical orbit each time.
3pt
0pt
2023/09/17 13:44
Perihelion Shift of Mercury
There is one more problem. Size of Mercury receives surplus force. But where does this surplus force go ?
In figure of perihelion shift of Mercury,its destination seems not to be found. Ah, perhaps the same phenomenon as Moon's retreat (Moon's orbit is expanding) will be destination. This surplus force probably turns and expands Mercury's elliptical orbit each time.
3pt0pt
74中山 2023/09/18 10:58
Perihelion Shift of Mercury
[Size of Mercury increases gravity during orbital motion]
Mm/r^2 is formula for gravity. There are models for Mercury and Sun. When, 2Mm is 100 and r is 50, gravity is 0.04. Next, two half spheres of Mercury are lined up on the line of action of Sun's gravity. Mm is 50, r is 49 and 51. Then, gravity is 0.0400479.
[Size of Mercury increases centrifugal force during orbital motion]
See my post posted on March 15, 2023 (or around).
5pt
2pt
2023/09/18 10:58
Perihelion Shift of Mercury
[Size of Mercury increases gravity during orbital motion]
Mm/r^2 is formula for gravity. There are models for Mercury and Sun. When, 2Mm is 100 and r is 50, gravity is 0.04. Next, two half spheres of Mercury are lined up on the line of action of Sun's gravity. Mm is 50, r is 49 and 51. Then, gravity is 0.0400479.
[Size of Mercury increases centrifugal force during orbital motion]
See my post posted on March 15, 2023 (or around).
5pt2pt
75中山 2023/09/22 14:27
Moon’s Retreat
Moon is said to be moving away from Earth by several centimeters per year. As proposed formally (posted on 08-05. by me), size of Moon will increase its centrifugal force (compared to calculated as a point). This additional amount will be divided in rotation of long axis and in extension of long axis of orbit of Moon. Is Mercury moving away from Sun too ?
2pt
5pt
2023/09/22 14:27
Moon’s Retreat
Moon is said to be moving away from Earth by several centimeters per year. As proposed formally (posted on 08-05. by me), size of Moon will increase its centrifugal force (compared to calculated as a point). This additional amount will be divided in rotation of long axis and in extension of long axis of orbit of Moon. Is Mercury moving away from Sun too ?
2pt5pt
78中山 2023/09/23 12:57
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (rewritten, from my post, posted on Sep 16 or around)
There is a figure of Mercury and its orbit. Mercury is drawn as a single point. But actually, Mercury has a size, and this size will slightly increase magnitude of gravity and centrifugal force of Mercury. Now, limit our consideration to half of orbit from perihelion to aphelion. Increase in gravity will shift aphelion in the direction of revolution. On the other hand, increase in centrifugal force will shift aphelion in the opposite direction of revolution. In increase, gravity will exceed.
0pt
0pt
2023/09/23 12:57
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (rewritten, from my post, posted on Sep 16 or around)
There is a figure of Mercury and its orbit. Mercury is drawn as a single point. But actually, Mercury has a size, and this size will slightly increase magnitude of gravity and centrifugal force of Mercury. Now, limit our consideration to half of orbit from perihelion to aphelion. Increase in gravity will shift aphelion in the direction of revolution. On the other hand, increase in centrifugal force will shift aphelion in the opposite direction of revolution. In increase, gravity will exceed.
0pt0pt
79中山 2023/09/25 15:33
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (supplement)
Size of Mercury will cause the difference in its gravity and in its orbit. It will rotate long axis and shift perihelion (in the direction of revolution).
But, will size of Mercury cause difference in its centrifugal force ? This difference probably correspond to the difference in motion that is caused by difference in gravity.
0pt
0pt
2023/09/25 15:33
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (supplement)
Size of Mercury will cause the difference in its gravity and in its orbit. It will rotate long axis and shift perihelion (in the direction of revolution).
But, will size of Mercury cause difference in its centrifugal force ? This difference probably correspond to the difference in motion that is caused by difference in gravity.
0pt0pt
81中山 2023/09/28 12:55
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (supplement)
About this ploblem, some posts remain unsure are posted. Below is one of them.
Size of Mercury seems to increase its gravity slightly and increase its centrifugal force slightly also. And, in magnitude, gravity seems to exceed. If this is true, what does it have to do with Newton's third law of motion? I throw up my hands.
0pt
0pt
2023/09/28 12:55
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (supplement)
About this ploblem, some posts remain unsure are posted. Below is one of them.
Size of Mercury seems to increase its gravity slightly and increase its centrifugal force slightly also. And, in magnitude, gravity seems to exceed. If this is true, what does it have to do with Newton's third law of motion? I throw up my hands.
0pt0pt
82中山 2023/09/29 11:26
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (estimate)
Size of Mercury will increase Mercury's gravity. The main result will be slight expansion of orbit, and followed by shift in perihelion. Therefore, centrifugal force also increases. Newton's third law of motion will be inviolable.
0pt
0pt
2023/09/29 11:26
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (estimate)
Size of Mercury will increase Mercury's gravity. The main result will be slight expansion of orbit, and followed by shift in perihelion. Therefore, centrifugal force also increases. Newton's third law of motion will be inviolable.
0pt0pt
83中山 2023/10/08 10:51
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (rewritten)
Allow me to rewrite my previous post (Sep 29 and around).
Shift of perihelion is constant. Then, a doubt arises. What is momentum of Mercury ? Is it increasing ? Is it decreasing ? Is there no increase or decrease ? I'd like to hear even hypothesis.
0pt
0pt
2023/10/08 10:51
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (rewritten)
Allow me to rewrite my previous post (Sep 29 and around).
Shift of perihelion is constant. Then, a doubt arises. What is momentum of Mercury ? Is it increasing ? Is it decreasing ? Is there no increase or decrease ? I'd like to hear even hypothesis.
0pt0pt
84中山 2023/10/17 14:29
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (estimate)
Two Mercurys are revolving. One is in the orbit of Mercury and the other is in the orbit of Venus. In the former, magnitude of shift of perihelion seems to be larger. This is probably because effect of Mercury's size is greater in the former.
0pt
0pt
2023/10/17 14:29
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (estimate)
Two Mercurys are revolving. One is in the orbit of Mercury and the other is in the orbit of Venus. In the former, magnitude of shift of perihelion seems to be larger. This is probably because effect of Mercury's size is greater in the former.
0pt0pt
85中山 2023/10/19 07:54
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (continued)
Imagine Mercury is revolving in the orbit of Neptune. Size of Mercury seen from Sun is close to a single point. So, magnitude of perihelion shift as two-body problem will be slight. And are perturbations outstanding ?
0pt
0pt
2023/10/19 07:54
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (continued)
Imagine Mercury is revolving in the orbit of Neptune. Size of Mercury seen from Sun is close to a single point. So, magnitude of perihelion shift as two-body problem will be slight. And are perturbations outstanding ?
0pt0pt
86中山 2023/10/23 10:54
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (supplement)
Imagine that two Mercurys are revolving in the orbit of Venus and Neptune. At two perihelions, Mercury moves in the same vector (direction and speed) as Venus and Neptune. Magnitude of Mercury's shift of perihelion will be smaller than that of the two. Because size of Mercury is smaller than that of the two.
0pt
0pt
2023/10/23 10:54
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (supplement)
Imagine that two Mercurys are revolving in the orbit of Venus and Neptune. At two perihelions, Mercury moves in the same vector (direction and speed) as Venus and Neptune. Magnitude of Mercury's shift of perihelion will be smaller than that of the two. Because size of Mercury is smaller than that of the two.
0pt0pt
88中山 2023/10/25 10:36
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (and free fall)
Towards Earth, two bodies with the same mass are in free fall. One is assumed to be a single point (with no size), and the other is a long pole (falling vertically). Also assumed that gravity of Earth is constant at g. As posted formerly, magnitude of gravity of Earth acting on two bodies will be former < latter slightly. As example, in my former post, it was 0.04 < 0.04000479. So latter continues to fall in advance. In a broad sense, orbital motion is considered to be free fall. It seems that the shift of perihelion of Mercury is caused by its size.
0pt
0pt
2023/10/25 10:36
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (and free fall)
Towards Earth, two bodies with the same mass are in free fall. One is assumed to be a single point (with no size), and the other is a long pole (falling vertically). Also assumed that gravity of Earth is constant at g. As posted formerly, magnitude of gravity of Earth acting on two bodies will be former < latter slightly. As example, in my former post, it was 0.04 < 0.04000479. So latter continues to fall in advance. In a broad sense, orbital motion is considered to be free fall. It seems that the shift of perihelion of Mercury is caused by its size.
0pt0pt
89中山 2023/10/31 10:44
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (question)
Value of perihelion shift of Mercury is 5.75 seconds/year (observed). Of this value, 5.32 seconds/year is said to be caused by gravity (perturbation) of other planets. And remaining 0.43 seconds/year is attributed to general relativity. Here, a question arises. Why is perihelion shift (of each orbiting) the same regardless of the direction and distances of other planets that exert gravity on Mercury ?
In a site in English "Perihelion Precession of the Planets", there are tables on observed values and on theoretical values for perihelion shift on planets (of solar system). The same question arises.
0pt
0pt
2023/10/31 10:44
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (question)
Value of perihelion shift of Mercury is 5.75 seconds/year (observed). Of this value, 5.32 seconds/year is said to be caused by gravity (perturbation) of other planets. And remaining 0.43 seconds/year is attributed to general relativity. Here, a question arises. Why is perihelion shift (of each orbiting) the same regardless of the direction and distances of other planets that exert gravity on Mercury ?
In a site in English "Perihelion Precession of the Planets", there are tables on observed values and on theoretical values for perihelion shift on planets (of solar system). The same question arises.
0pt0pt
90中山 2023/10/31 13:36
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (question)
If one centroid is an approximation, two centroids are also approximation. But an inequality 0.04 < 0.0400479 will be a problem presentation for Newton's spherical shell theorem.
0pt
0pt
2023/10/31 13:36
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (question)
If one centroid is an approximation, two centroids are also approximation. But an inequality 0.04 < 0.0400479 will be a problem presentation for Newton's spherical shell theorem.
0pt0pt
91中山 2023/11/05 13:01
Shift of Perihelion and Vernal Equinox of Earth (an idea)
A drawing shows Sun, Earth, and orbit of Earth. It also shows shift of perihelion of Earth (in the direction of revolution, annually) and shift of vernal equinox (in the opposite direction of revolution, annually). Shift of vernal equinox is said to be caused by precession of rotation axis (of Earth). Precession of rotation axis ? Really ? Shift of vernal equinox seems to be caused by extra centrifugal force due to size of Earth. There is no other reason than that it seems to fit well.
Note: Perihelion is said to take about 110,000 years, and vernal equinox takes about 26,000 years to complete one revolution.
0pt
0pt
2023/11/05 13:01
Shift of Perihelion and Vernal Equinox of Earth (an idea)
A drawing shows Sun, Earth, and orbit of Earth. It also shows shift of perihelion of Earth (in the direction of revolution, annually) and shift of vernal equinox (in the opposite direction of revolution, annually). Shift of vernal equinox is said to be caused by precession of rotation axis (of Earth). Precession of rotation axis ? Really ? Shift of vernal equinox seems to be caused by extra centrifugal force due to size of Earth. There is no other reason than that it seems to fit well.
Note: Perihelion is said to take about 110,000 years, and vernal equinox takes about 26,000 years to complete one revolution.
0pt0pt
92中山 2023/11/06 07:49
To yesterday's post, following my posts are related.
Aug 5, Sep 19, and Sep 23, (2023). By
0pt
0pt
2023/11/06 07:49
To yesterday's post, following my posts are related.
Aug 5, Sep 19, and Sep 23, (2023). By
0pt0pt
93中山 2023/11/07 08:56
A web-site with figures related to problem below appears using following keywords. Sorry, in Japanese.
近日点の移動 国立天文台暦計算室
0pt
0pt
2023/11/07 08:56
A web-site with figures related to problem below appears using following keywords. Sorry, in Japanese.
近日点の移動 国立天文台暦計算室
0pt0pt
94中山 2023/11/10 09:35
Title of the page of the National astronomical observatory (of Japan) ephemeris computation office is shown below. Sorry for repeated addition.
暦Wiki/近日点の移動−国立天文台暦計算室
0pt
0pt
2023/11/10 09:35
Title of the page of the National astronomical observatory (of Japan) ephemeris computation office is shown below. Sorry for repeated addition.
暦Wiki/近日点の移動−国立天文台暦計算室
0pt0pt
95中山 2023/11/20 12:44
Shift of Perihelion and Vernal Equinox of Earth (question)
A question arises. Aren't shift of perihelion and vernal equinox (of Earth) in the same direction and magnitude ? To me, it is probable but not certain. I'll leave it to the physicists.
0pt
0pt
2023/11/20 12:44
Shift of Perihelion and Vernal Equinox of Earth (question)
A question arises. Aren't shift of perihelion and vernal equinox (of Earth) in the same direction and magnitude ? To me, it is probable but not certain. I'll leave it to the physicists.
0pt0pt
96中山 2023/12/10 16:15
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (summary)
In a web-site in English titled "Perihelion Precession of the Planets", there is a table on observed rates from Mercury (5.75 seconds/year) to Neptune (0.36 seconds/year). In these, direction of precession is the direction of planet's revolution, and these magnitude are assumed to be constant. Let's assume this table is true. So, this phenomenon will be caused by two bodies: planet each and Sun.
Adams and Le Verrier predicted the existence of Neptune and its position on the celestial sphere (from the precession of Uranus's position). But it was temporary and exceptional precession (perturbation).
0pt
0pt
2023/12/10 16:15
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (summary)
In a web-site in English titled "Perihelion Precession of the Planets", there is a table on observed rates from Mercury (5.75 seconds/year) to Neptune (0.36 seconds/year). In these, direction of precession is the direction of planet's revolution, and these magnitude are assumed to be constant. Let's assume this table is true. So, this phenomenon will be caused by two bodies: planet each and Sun.
Adams and Le Verrier predicted the existence of Neptune and its position on the celestial sphere (from the precession of Uranus's position). But it was temporary and exceptional precession (perturbation).
0pt0pt
98中山 2023/12/12 15:36 
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (in this A THORY ?)
Perihelion shift of Mercury is 575 seconds in 100 years. In wikipedia, there is a site titled "Perigee Shift" (in Japanese). In it, it's stated that 532 of the 575 seconds are caused by perturbations due to gravity of other planets, and remaining 43 seconds are caused by the effects of general relativity. Simply adding up gravity of other planets ? Is this A THEORY ?
0pt
0pt
2023/12/12 15:36
Perihelion Shift of Mercury (in this A THORY ?)
Perihelion shift of Mercury is 575 seconds in 100 years. In wikipedia, there is a site titled "Perigee Shift" (in Japanese). In it, it's stated that 532 of the 575 seconds are caused by perturbations due to gravity of other planets, and remaining 43 seconds are caused by the effects of general relativity. Simply adding up gravity of other planets ? Is this A THEORY ?
0pt0pt
99中山 2023/12/14 15:46
Bending of Light
Moon occults (covers up) star A on the celestial sphere. In this occultation, there is a moment when star A, center of Moon, and an observer make a straight line. An artificial disk the same apparent diameter (as Moon) follows Moon at the same apparent speed (as Moon). And it occults star A in the same way (as Moon). If occultation time is the same, there will be no bending of light due to gravity.
0pt
0pt
2023/12/14 15:46
Bending of Light
Moon occults (covers up) star A on the celestial sphere. In this occultation, there is a moment when star A, center of Moon, and an observer make a straight line. An artificial disk the same apparent diameter (as Moon) follows Moon at the same apparent speed (as Moon). And it occults star A in the same way (as Moon). If occultation time is the same, there will be no bending of light due to gravity.
0pt0pt
100中山 2024/01/04 16:16
Motion of a Mass Point & Aether
Every mass point is either in motion or not. Motion is said to be relative, but this is only appearance. For mass points in motion, there are motions in which vector of motion (magnitude and direction) vary and motions in which there is no varying. In motion varying, inertial force that varies (qualitatively or quantitatively) is recognized. In motion without varying, inertial force is not recognized.
The above will be depending on existence of a uniform isotropic aether in space.
0pt
0pt
2024/01/04 16:16
Motion of a Mass Point & Aether
Every mass point is either in motion or not. Motion is said to be relative, but this is only appearance. For mass points in motion, there are motions in which vector of motion (magnitude and direction) vary and motions in which there is no varying. In motion varying, inertial force that varies (qualitatively or quantitatively) is recognized. In motion without varying, inertial force is not recognized.
The above will be depending on existence of a uniform isotropic aether in space.
0pt0pt
101中山 2024/01/22 20:09
Kinetic Energy: Momentum: Force: Impulse (inference)
A homogeneous disk with mass M, diameter 2a, and uniform thickness is stationary (not rotating) with respect to the celestial sphere. Angular momentum of this disk is zero. It is zero for any observer in any motion.
There is a type of momentum called linear momentum, which is limited to motion in a straight line. A body of
mass M is moving in a straight line. By analogy with rotational motion, there may be situations where linear momentum is zero even on a straight line (stationary on a straight line). All movements of a mass point can be understood as movements relative to aether (absolute rest).
2pt
0pt
2024/01/22 20:09
Kinetic Energy: Momentum: Force: Impulse (inference)
A homogeneous disk with mass M, diameter 2a, and uniform thickness is stationary (not rotating) with respect to the celestial sphere. Angular momentum of this disk is zero. It is zero for any observer in any motion.
There is a type of momentum called linear momentum, which is limited to motion in a straight line. A body of
mass M is moving in a straight line. By analogy with rotational motion, there may be situations where linear momentum is zero even on a straight line (stationary on a straight line). All movements of a mass point can be understood as movements relative to aether (absolute rest).
2pt0pt
102中山 2024/01/24 09:40
Kinetic energy: momentum: force: impulse (supplement)
Momentum is physical quantity that we can vary in laboratory. And the rotational momentum can be zero (no matter who sees it). The same will go for linear momentum. The two momentums will be adjoining. But we don't understand that, and we don't try.
4pt
0pt
2024/01/24 09:40
Kinetic energy: momentum: force: impulse (supplement)
Momentum is physical quantity that we can vary in laboratory. And the rotational momentum can be zero (no matter who sees it). The same will go for linear momentum. The two momentums will be adjoining. But we don't understand that, and we don't try.
4pt0pt
103中山 2024/01/26 18:28
Kinetic Energy: Momentum: Force: Impulse (supplement)
Rotational momentum seems to be no matter. In the rotational motion of a body (imagine a disk), there is a state of speed zero. And on both sides of the disk, there are plus and minus rotational motions. We see plus and minus rotational motions qualitatively and quantitatively.
But what about linear momentum ? Even in the linear motion of a body, there will be a state of speed zero. And on both sides of the body, there will be plus and minus linear motions. We cannot see it qualitatively and quantitatively. But probably, is it tha same to rotational motions ?
3pt
0pt
2024/01/26 18:28
Kinetic Energy: Momentum: Force: Impulse (supplement)
Rotational momentum seems to be no matter. In the rotational motion of a body (imagine a disk), there is a state of speed zero. And on both sides of the disk, there are plus and minus rotational motions. We see plus and minus rotational motions qualitatively and quantitatively.
But what about linear momentum ? Even in the linear motion of a body, there will be a state of speed zero. And on both sides of the body, there will be plus and minus linear motions. We cannot see it qualitatively and quantitatively. But probably, is it tha same to rotational motions ?
3pt0pt
104中山 2024/02/01 15:45
Speed of sound is variable, and also, speed of light will be variable.
Equation v = λ f holds between sound source and the observer. v is speed of sound to the observer, λ is wavelength, and f is frequency to the observer. The observer is in motion, which causes the frequency in varying. In above equation, what is varying is v (λ is not varying).
Equation v = λ f will also hold between light source and the observer. It will be v that is varying.
5pt
2pt
2024/02/01 15:45
Speed of sound is variable, and also, speed of light will be variable.
Equation v = λ f holds between sound source and the observer. v is speed of sound to the observer, λ is wavelength, and f is frequency to the observer. The observer is in motion, which causes the frequency in varying. In above equation, what is varying is v (λ is not varying).
Equation v = λ f will also hold between light source and the observer. It will be v that is varying.
5pt2pt
105中山 2024/02/06 10:48
Doppler Effect and Variable Speed of Light
For Doppler effect of sound waves, following will hold. Speed of sound waves in air, which is medium for sound waves propagation, is constant. In other words, speed of sound waves is constant only with respect to air.
Doppler effect of light waves will be the same as that of sound waves. Medium of light waves is aether, which is uniformly isotropic. In other words, speed of light waves is constant only with respect to aether.
5pt
1pt
2024/02/06 10:48
Doppler Effect and Variable Speed of Light
For Doppler effect of sound waves, following will hold. Speed of sound waves in air, which is medium for sound waves propagation, is constant. In other words, speed of sound waves is constant only with respect to air.
Doppler effect of light waves will be the same as that of sound waves. Medium of light waves is aether, which is uniformly isotropic. In other words, speed of light waves is constant only with respect to aether.
5pt1pt
106中山 2024/02/09 10:20
Culculating Equation of Doppler Effect
Speed of sound waves is constant only with respect to air, which is medium of propagation. Speed of light waves will probably be constant only with respect to aether, which is medium of propagation.
Therefore, calculating equation for frequency of light waves observed by an observer must be the same as culculating equation for frequency of sound waves observed by an observer.
0pt
0pt
2024/02/09 10:20
Culculating Equation of Doppler Effect
Speed of sound waves is constant only with respect to air, which is medium of propagation. Speed of light waves will probably be constant only with respect to aether, which is medium of propagation.
Therefore, calculating equation for frequency of light waves observed by an observer must be the same as culculating equation for frequency of sound waves observed by an observer.
0pt0pt
107中山 2024/02/11 09:01
Sound Waves, Light Waves and an Observers (summary)
Sound waves propagate through air, and light waves propagate through aether. Medium is uniformly iosotropic, and speed of waves with respect to medium is constant. So, when a point-like wave source is stationary in medium, waves drawn on a plane are concentric circles. Therefore, if observer is moving with respect to medium, speed of sound waves and light waves for observer is not constant.
Note: Light waves using air as a medium propagate in the same way as sound waves.
0pt
0pt
2024/02/11 09:01
Sound Waves, Light Waves and an Observers (summary)
Sound waves propagate through air, and light waves propagate through aether. Medium is uniformly iosotropic, and speed of waves with respect to medium is constant. So, when a point-like wave source is stationary in medium, waves drawn on a plane are concentric circles. Therefore, if observer is moving with respect to medium, speed of sound waves and light waves for observer is not constant.
Note: Light waves using air as a medium propagate in the same way as sound waves.
0pt0pt
108中山 2024/02/12 15:17
Propagation of Light (again)
Light propagates in two ways.
1) A reflector placed on moon's surface is irradiated with laser light, and by reflected light, distance to Moon is measured. Error is a few centimeters. Laser light emitted from light source will follow emission theory for at least one second. This guess can be scored 90 points out of 100 points.
2) Various types of aberration. Light will follow aether reference frame after passing through the region 1. This guess can be scored 120 points out of 100 points.
Note) In air,light propagates following to air reference frame. So, MM experiments done in air is nonsense.
0pt
0pt
2024/02/12 15:17
Propagation of Light (again)
Light propagates in two ways.
1) A reflector placed on moon's surface is irradiated with laser light, and by reflected light, distance to Moon is measured. Error is a few centimeters. Laser light emitted from light source will follow emission theory for at least one second. This guess can be scored 90 points out of 100 points.
2) Various types of aberration. Light will follow aether reference frame after passing through the region 1. This guess can be scored 120 points out of 100 points.
Note) In air,light propagates following to air reference frame. So, MM experiments done in air is nonsense.
0pt0pt
109中山 2024/02/19 13:57
Is speed of light constant ? (again)
As posted preciously (one of which is on 2023-2-18), constancy of speed of light is impossible. Therefore, time dilation and Lorentz contraction are also impossible. Without a doubt.
0pt
0pt
2024/02/19 13:57
Is speed of light constant ? (again)
As posted preciously (one of which is on 2023-2-18), constancy of speed of light is impossible. Therefore, time dilation and Lorentz contraction are also impossible. Without a doubt.
0pt0pt
110中山 2024/02/20 15:30
Aberration (again)
Space is filled with aetheric reference frame (uniform isotropic : absolute rest frame). This will be only one hypothesis that can explain various types of aberration.
Aberration is a phenomenon completed in upper atmosphere. It is the same as refraction. Result of Airy's experiment (tube of telescope is filled with water) is only natural.
Due to aberration, it is said that visible position (direction) of celestial bodies shift beyond the direction of motion of Earth. No, shift will be behind the direction of motion of Earth. This will be clear by illustration of light rays in atmosphere.
Draw trajectory of position of a celestial body (on celestial sphere. returns to source every year). Ellipse of annual aberration will be warped by secular aberration. Daily aberration will be many small circles (365 pearls).
0pt
1pt
2024/02/20 15:30
Aberration (again)
Space is filled with aetheric reference frame (uniform isotropic : absolute rest frame). This will be only one hypothesis that can explain various types of aberration.
Aberration is a phenomenon completed in upper atmosphere. It is the same as refraction. Result of Airy's experiment (tube of telescope is filled with water) is only natural.
Due to aberration, it is said that visible position (direction) of celestial bodies shift beyond the direction of motion of Earth. No, shift will be behind the direction of motion of Earth. This will be clear by illustration of light rays in atmosphere.
Draw trajectory of position of a celestial body (on celestial sphere. returns to source every year). Ellipse of annual aberration will be warped by secular aberration. Daily aberration will be many small circles (365 pearls).
0pt1pt
111中山 2024/02/21 11:29
Aberration (again)
Space is filled with aether. For light, aether acts as a medium (as a reference frame). In other words, light propagates at the same speed through aether. Regardless of the direction of propagation. Earth is moving at different speeds with respect relative to aether. Therefore, speed of light with respect to Earth is different.
0pt
0pt
2024/02/21 11:29
Aberration (again)
Space is filled with aether. For light, aether acts as a medium (as a reference frame). In other words, light propagates at the same speed through aether. Regardless of the direction of propagation. Earth is moving at different speeds with respect relative to aether. Therefore, speed of light with respect to Earth is different.
0pt0pt
112中山 2024/02/26 13:43
Emission Theory (guess)
For a few seconds after emission, propagation of light will follow emission theory, and then follows the aether reference frame (as written before). In other words, from the aether reference frame, speed of light will vary, and energy of a photon will also vary. It is said that energy of light is proportional to its frequency.
Note) The above will be possible to explain accuracy of measuring the distance to Moon (by laser) and aberration without contradiction.
0pt
0pt
2024/02/26 13:43
Emission Theory (guess)
For a few seconds after emission, propagation of light will follow emission theory, and then follows the aether reference frame (as written before). In other words, from the aether reference frame, speed of light will vary, and energy of a photon will also vary. It is said that energy of light is proportional to its frequency.
Note) The above will be possible to explain accuracy of measuring the distance to Moon (by laser) and aberration without contradiction.
0pt0pt
113中山 2024/02/28 12:34
Propagation of Light in Two Ways (guess)
In space, spaceship is floating (not accelerating). From this spacecraft, multiple probes begin a uniform linear motion towards assigned star on celestial sphere. A light source set on the probes that shines at a certain frequency is visible from the spacecraft.
Is the assumption that propagation of light in two ways (written before) correct ? If correct, frequency of probe's light (reaches the spacecraft) that emitted from before and after a few light-seconds distance will be different (although in rare cases it may not be different). The two, emission theory and aether will revive as phoenixes.
0pt
0pt
2024/02/28 12:34
Propagation of Light in Two Ways (guess)
In space, spaceship is floating (not accelerating). From this spacecraft, multiple probes begin a uniform linear motion towards assigned star on celestial sphere. A light source set on the probes that shines at a certain frequency is visible from the spacecraft.
Is the assumption that propagation of light in two ways (written before) correct ? If correct, frequency of probe's light (reaches the spacecraft) that emitted from before and after a few light-seconds distance will be different (although in rare cases it may not be different). The two, emission theory and aether will revive as phoenixes.
0pt0pt
114中山 2024/03/02 08:51
Propagation of Light in Two Ways (again
Annual aberration and daily aberration mean motion of Earth (with respect to aether). On the other hand, if the distance to the light source is moderate (no, even the distance to the Moon also !), propagation of light will follow emission theory. Relativity will fade away, and both aether and emission theory will revive. Someday as phoenixes.
0pt
0pt
2024/03/02 08:51
Propagation of Light in Two Ways (again
Annual aberration and daily aberration mean motion of Earth (with respect to aether). On the other hand, if the distance to the light source is moderate (no, even the distance to the Moon also !), propagation of light will follow emission theory. Relativity will fade away, and both aether and emission theory will revive. Someday as phoenixes.
0pt0pt
115中山 2024/03/06 09:34
Measuring Aether (again)
In outer space, frequency and wavelength of incoming lights from two stars (from opposite directions on the celestial sphere) are measured. To the measurer, speed of two incoming lights will be different. And it will mean the motion (in the direction of light path) of the measurer with respect to aether.
Note) If the measurer moves in the direction of light path, frequency and speed of two incoming lights will vary. Because, wavelength of two incoming light does not vary.
0pt
0pt
2024/03/06 09:34
Measuring Aether (again)
In outer space, frequency and wavelength of incoming lights from two stars (from opposite directions on the celestial sphere) are measured. To the measurer, speed of two incoming lights will be different. And it will mean the motion (in the direction of light path) of the measurer with respect to aether.
Note) If the measurer moves in the direction of light path, frequency and speed of two incoming lights will vary. Because, wavelength of two incoming light does not vary.
0pt0pt
117中山 2024/03/24 17:06
Centrifugal Force (again)
Formula for centrifugal force is F = m v^2/r. And as Newton's third law of motion shows, centrifugal force is an action, centripetal force is a reaction, and the magnitude of the two forces is the same. Both are true forces, not fictitious forces.
In the shape of the cross, rods of length 4r and 2r are rotating horizontally. Assume that there are mass points m at each of four edges of the rod, and that the mass of rods is zero. Tension (centrifugal force) acting on the rods is true force.
3pt
0pt
2024/03/24 17:06
Centrifugal Force (again)
Formula for centrifugal force is F = m v^2/r. And as Newton's third law of motion shows, centrifugal force is an action, centripetal force is a reaction, and the magnitude of the two forces is the same. Both are true forces, not fictitious forces.
In the shape of the cross, rods of length 4r and 2r are rotating horizontally. Assume that there are mass points m at each of four edges of the rod, and that the mass of rods is zero. Tension (centrifugal force) acting on the rods is true force.
3pt0pt
118中山 2024/03/25 17:42
Centrifugal force (again)
Tension is centrifugal force, an effect of Newton’s third law of motion, and centripetal force is a reaction. The two are true forces. Rotational motion can be thought through to accelerated motion and non-accelerated motion (including absolute rest). Frame will be the celestial sphere and the aether.
3pt
0pt
2024/03/25 17:42
Centrifugal force (again)
Tension is centrifugal force, an effect of Newton’s third law of motion, and centripetal force is a reaction. The two are true forces. Rotational motion can be thought through to accelerated motion and non-accelerated motion (including absolute rest). Frame will be the celestial sphere and the aether.
3pt0pt
119中山 2024/03/28 15:17
Accelerated Motion & Inertial Force (again)
Accelerated motion and inertial force correspond qualitatively (in the direction of celestial sphere and of aether) quantitatively. This will lead to zero inertial force in non-accelerated motion. Also, let us assume that non-accelerating motion includes absolute rest.
4pt
0pt
2024/03/28 15:17
Accelerated Motion & Inertial Force (again)
Accelerated motion and inertial force correspond qualitatively (in the direction of celestial sphere and of aether) quantitatively. This will lead to zero inertial force in non-accelerated motion. Also, let us assume that non-accelerating motion includes absolute rest.
4pt0pt
120中山 2024/04/01 15:21
Measuring Aether (again)
In outer space, frequency and wavelength of incoming lights from two stars (from opposite directions on the celestial sphere) are measured. To the measurer, speed of two incoming lights will be different. And sum of speed of two lights will be 2c (or close to 2c). In post 115, it is forgotten to note. Sorry.
3pt
0pt
2024/04/01 15:21
Measuring Aether (again)
In outer space, frequency and wavelength of incoming lights from two stars (from opposite directions on the celestial sphere) are measured. To the measurer, speed of two incoming lights will be different. And sum of speed of two lights will be 2c (or close to 2c). In post 115, it is forgotten to note. Sorry.
3pt0pt
122中山 2024/04/12 10:34
Accelerated Motion & Inertial Force (again)
Accelerated motion is absolute motion relative to aether frame. The two are two sides of the same coin. Gravity is irrelevant at all, and does not play a role in this problem.
6pt
0pt
2024/04/12 10:34
Accelerated Motion & Inertial Force (again)
Accelerated motion is absolute motion relative to aether frame. The two are two sides of the same coin. Gravity is irrelevant at all, and does not play a role in this problem.
6pt0pt
123中山 2024/04/12 10:47
Accelerated Motion (again)
A passenger car is accelerating to the right (uniform acceleration). A light source (wavelength is onstant) at the rear wall of the car emits light, and on the front wall, frequency measuring device is settled. During acceleration, in the car, there will be more waves than before. In other words, accelerated motion is not fictitious (inertial force will not be fictitious also).
A ray of light is emitted from the ceiling of a passenger car directly below. When this car is accelerated, the light ray reaches the floor in a parabola. Difference between acceleration and non-acceleration is not fictitious.
5pt
0pt
2024/04/12 10:47
Accelerated Motion (again)
A passenger car is accelerating to the right (uniform acceleration). A light source (wavelength is onstant) at the rear wall of the car emits light, and on the front wall, frequency measuring device is settled. During acceleration, in the car, there will be more waves than before. In other words, accelerated motion is not fictitious (inertial force will not be fictitious also).
A ray of light is emitted from the ceiling of a passenger car directly below. When this car is accelerated, the light ray reaches the floor in a parabola. Difference between acceleration and non-acceleration is not fictitious.
5pt0pt
124中山 2024/04/12 11:15
Local Inertial Frame (again)
An elevator cabin is in free fall. Imagine mass points placed regularly in the elevator. Vector of inertial force acting on each mass point is the same. Local inertial frame is impossible.
Two elevators are moving apart horizontally. One is in accelerated motion and the other is in non-accelerated motion. By an accelerometer, to tell which one is accelerating is possible. In the elevator with accelerated motion, there is no inertial frame, even locally.
5pt
0pt
2024/04/12 11:15
Local Inertial Frame (again)
An elevator cabin is in free fall. Imagine mass points placed regularly in the elevator. Vector of inertial force acting on each mass point is the same. Local inertial frame is impossible.
Two elevators are moving apart horizontally. One is in accelerated motion and the other is in non-accelerated motion. By an accelerometer, to tell which one is accelerating is possible. In the elevator with accelerated motion, there is no inertial frame, even locally.
5pt0pt
125中山 2024/04/12 11:48
Time is Absolute (again)
◎ In relative motion
A spacecraft is moving horizontally in front of an observer. Plane waves of starlight (constant wavelength) is coming from directly above. Regardless of the speed of the spacecraft, coming waves are the same. Time is absolute, with no delay.
◎ In different gravity fields
There is a mirror high up in high tower. Light (constant wavelength) emitted from the ground is reflected by the mirror and returned to the ground. Frequency measured at these three points are the same (if these are not the same, number of waves on optical pathes will increase or decrease endlessly). Time is absolute, with no delay.
3pt
0pt
2024/04/12 11:48
Time is Absolute (again)
◎ In relative motion
A spacecraft is moving horizontally in front of an observer. Plane waves of starlight (constant wavelength) is coming from directly above. Regardless of the speed of the spacecraft, coming waves are the same. Time is absolute, with no delay.
◎ In different gravity fields
There is a mirror high up in high tower. Light (constant wavelength) emitted from the ground is reflected by the mirror and returned to the ground. Frequency measured at these three points are the same (if these are not the same, number of waves on optical pathes will increase or decrease endlessly). Time is absolute, with no delay.
3pt0pt
126中山 2024/04/16 16:59
Accelerated Motion and Non-Accelerated Motion (again)
Difference between the two motions above will be the difference of motion with respect to aether frame. A mass point moving in accelerated motion is accompanied by inertial force, that corresponds qualitatively and quantitatively. A mass point moving in non-accelerated motion (uniform linear motion) is not accompanied by inertial force.
A saying are trying about inertial force and gravity. What can we say by comparing the two words ? Inertial force is inertial force, gravity is gravity and both are true forces ! That seems to be all that can be said. This is a short report.
5pt
1pt
2024/04/16 16:59
Accelerated Motion and Non-Accelerated Motion (again)
Difference between the two motions above will be the difference of motion with respect to aether frame. A mass point moving in accelerated motion is accompanied by inertial force, that corresponds qualitatively and quantitatively. A mass point moving in non-accelerated motion (uniform linear motion) is not accompanied by inertial force.
A saying are trying about inertial force and gravity. What can we say by comparing the two words ? Inertial force is inertial force, gravity is gravity and both are true forces ! That seems to be all that can be said. This is a short report.
5pt1pt
127中山 2024/04/19 12:30
Equivalence principle (again)
On the ground, a passenger car is moving with uniform acceleration to the right. In the car, a body hanging from the ceiling with a string is swinging to the left. The angle can be explained qualitatively and quantitatively using equations based on Newton's laws of motion. What about equivalence principle ? Is there anyone who can ?
4pt
0pt
2024/04/19 12:30
Equivalence principle (again)
On the ground, a passenger car is moving with uniform acceleration to the right. In the car, a body hanging from the ceiling with a string is swinging to the left. The angle can be explained qualitatively and quantitatively using equations based on Newton's laws of motion. What about equivalence principle ? Is there anyone who can ?
4pt0pt
128中山 2024/04/20 10:19
Equivalence Principle (again)
Allow me to repeat the previous question,regarding two situations ◎ below. Two situations ◎ can be explainend qualitatively and quantitatively using formulas based on Newton's laws of motion. The question is, what about equivalent principle ? Is there anyone who can ? is.
◎ Forces of the same magnitude are acting on a mass point from the left and right directions. Types of forces are tension, gravity, and inertial force. Since there are no combinations of inertial forces and ine
rtial forces, there are five combinations of forces (ignoring the difference between left and right).
◎ A body is slidingaq down inclined surface and (no friction).
0pt
0pt
2024/04/20 10:19
Equivalence Principle (again)
Allow me to repeat the previous question,regarding two situations ◎ below. Two situations ◎ can be explainend qualitatively and quantitatively using formulas based on Newton's laws of motion. The question is, what about equivalent principle ? Is there anyone who can ? is.
◎ Forces of the same magnitude are acting on a mass point from the left and right directions. Types of forces are tension, gravity, and inertial force. Since there are no combinations of inertial forces and ine
rtial forces, there are five combinations of forces (ignoring the difference between left and right).
◎ A body is slidingaq down inclined surface and (no friction).
0pt0pt
129中山 2024/04/27 13:56
Accelerated Motion and Non-Accelerated Motion (again) (クリ)
All accelerated motion is accompanied by inertial force (it is reaction. See Newton's third law of motion).
All non-accelerated motion is not accompanied by inertial force. It is the same for absolute rest (relative to aether frame).
Gravity is unrelated to this problem.
0pt
0pt
2024/04/27 13:56
Accelerated Motion and Non-Accelerated Motion (again) (クリ)
All accelerated motion is accompanied by inertial force (it is reaction. See Newton's third law of motion).
All non-accelerated motion is not accompanied by inertial force. It is the same for absolute rest (relative to aether frame).
Gravity is unrelated to this problem.
0pt0pt関連トピック
掲示板TOPへ戻る